Literature DB >> 16808615

Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose-response analyses.

Daniel W Schafer1, Ethel S Gilbert.   

Abstract

Statistical dose-response analyses in radiation epidemiology can produce misleading results if they fail to account for radiation dose uncertainties. While dosimetries may differ substantially depending on the ways in which the subjects were exposed, the statistical problems typically involve a predominantly linear dose-response curve, multiple sources of uncertainty, and uncertainty magnitudes that are best characterized as proportional rather than additive. We discuss some basic statistical issues in this setting, including the bias and shape distortion induced by classical and Berkson uncertainties, the effect of uncertain dose-prediction model parameters on estimated dose-response curves, and some notes on statistical methods for dose-response estimation in the presence of radiation dose uncertainties.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808615     DOI: 10.1667/RR3358.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  22 in total

1.  Radiation organ doses received in a nationwide cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists: methods and findings.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Martha S Linet; Jeremy S Miller; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Deukwoo Kwon; R Craig Yoder; Parveen Bhatti; Mark P Little; Preetha Rajaraman; Dunstana Melo; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Robert M Weinstock; Michele M Doody
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Impact of measurement error in radon exposure on the estimated excess relative risk of lung cancer death in a simulated study based on the French Uranium Miners' Cohort.

Authors:  Rodrigue S Allodji; Klervi Leuraud; Anne C M Thiébaut; Stéphane Henry; Dominique Laurier; Jacques Bénichou
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Estimation via corrected scores in general semiparametric regression models with error-prone covariates.

Authors:  Arnab Maity; Tatiyana V Apanasovich
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.125

4.  Fluoroscopy X-Ray Organ-Specific Dosimetry System (FLUXOR) for Estimation of Organ Doses and Their Uncertainties in the Canadian Fluoroscopy Cohort Study.

Authors:  A Iulian Apostoaei; Brian A Thomas; F Owen Hoffman; David C Kocher; Kathleen M Thiessen; David Borrego; Choonsik Lee; Steven L Simon; Lydia B Zablotska
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Non-parametric regression estimation from data contaminated by a mixture of Berkson and classical errors.

Authors:  Raymond J Carroll; Aurore Delaigle; Peter Hall
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 6.  Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.

Authors:  Ethel S Gilbert; Mark P Little; Dale L Preston; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

7.  The two-dimensional Monte Carlo: a new methodologic paradigm for dose reconstruction for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; F Owen Hoffman; Eduard Hofer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  SIMEX and standard error estimation in semiparametric measurement error models.

Authors:  Tatiyana V Apanasovich; Raymond J Carroll; Arnab Maity
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 1.125

9.  Multiple indicators, multiple causes measurement error models.

Authors:  Carmen D Tekwe; Randy L Carter; Harry M Cullings; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Ionising radiation and cancer risks: what have we learned from epidemiology?

Authors:  Ethel S Gilbert
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.