Literature DB >> 25551504

Dose reconstruction for the million worker study: status and guidelines.

André Bouville1, Richard E Toohey, John D Boice, Harold L Beck, Larry T Dauer, Keith F Eckerman, Derek Hagemeyer, Richard W Leggett, Michael T Mumma, Bruce Napier, Kathy H Pryor, Marvin Rosenstein, David A Schauer, Sami Sherbini, Daniel O Stram, James L Thompson, John E Till, Craig Yoder, Cary Zeitlin.   

Abstract

The primary aim of the epidemiologic study of one million U.S. radiation workers and veterans [the Million Worker Study (MWS)] is to provide scientifically valid information on the level of radiation risk when exposures are received gradually over time and not within seconds, as was the case for Japanese atomic bomb survivors. The primary outcome of the epidemiologic study is cancer mortality, but other causes of death such as cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease will be evaluated. The success of the study is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide realistic estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses that are as accurate and precise as possible and to properly evaluate their accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the MWS are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 y. The dosimetric issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, U.S. Department of Energy workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma- or x-ray sources, for some of the study groups, there is a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that requires internal radiation dosimetry assessments. Scientific Committee 6-9 has been established by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) to produce a report on the comprehensive organ dose assessment (including uncertainty analysis) for the MWS. The NCRP dosimetry report will cover the specifics of practical dose reconstruction for the ongoing epidemiologic studies with uncertainty analysis discussions and will be a specific application of the guidance provided in NCRP Report Nos. 158, 163, 164, and 171. The main role of the Committee is to provide guidelines to the various groups of dosimetrists involved in the MWS to ensure that certain dosimetry criteria are considered: calculation of annual absorbed doses in the organs of interest, separation of low and high linear-energy transfer components, evaluation of uncertainties, and quality assurance and quality control. It is recognized that the MWS and its approaches to dosimetry are a work in progress and that there will be flexibility and changes in direction as new information is obtained with regard to both dosimetry and the epidemiologic features of the study components. This paper focuses on the description of the various components of the MWS, the available dosimetry results, and the challenges that have been encountered. It is expected that the Committee will complete its report in 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25551504      PMCID: PMC4854640          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  36 in total

1.  Radiation organ doses received in a nationwide cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists: methods and findings.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Martha S Linet; Jeremy S Miller; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Deukwoo Kwon; R Craig Yoder; Parveen Bhatti; Mark P Little; Preetha Rajaraman; Dunstana Melo; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Robert M Weinstock; Michele M Doody
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Power and uncertainty analysis of epidemiological studies of radiation-related disease risk in which dose estimates are based on a complex dosimetry system: some observations.

Authors:  Daniel O Stram; Kenneth J Kopecky
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  FISH chromosome aberration analysis on retired radiation workers from the Sellafield nuclear facility.

Authors:  E Janet Tawn; Caroline A Whitehouse; Robert E Tarone
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  ICRP Publication 116. Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures.

Authors:  N Petoussi-Henss; W E Bolch; K F Eckerman; A Endo; N Hertel; J Hunt; M Pelliccioni; H Schlattl; M Zankl
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2010 Apr-Oct

5.  Estimating historical radiation doses to a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Michele Morin Doody; James Neton; Thurman Wenzl; Patricia Stewart; Aparna K Mohan; R Craig Yoder; Michael Hauptmann; D Michal Freedman; John Cardarelli; H Amy Feng; André Bouville; Martha Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  A health survey of radiologic technologists.

Authors:  J D Boice; J S Mandel; M M Doody; R C Yoder; R McGowan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Mayak worker dosimetry study: an overview.

Authors:  E K Vasilenko; V F Khokhryakov; S C Miller; J J Fix; K Eckerman; D O Choe; M Gorelov; V V Khokhryakov; V Knyasev; M P Krahenbuhl; R I Scherpelz; M Smetanin; K Suslova; V Vostrotin
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  A respiratory model for uranium aluminide based on occupational data.

Authors:  R W Leggett; K F Eckerman; J D Boice
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 1.394

9.  Mortality through 1990 among white male workers at the Los Alamos National Laboratory: considering exposures to plutonium and external ionizing radiation.

Authors:  L D Wiggs; E R Johnson; C A Cox-DeVore; G L Voelz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  The two-dimensional Monte Carlo: a new methodologic paradigm for dose reconstruction for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; F Owen Hoffman; Eduard Hofer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  14 in total

1.  Mortality among military participants at the 1957 PLUMBBOB nuclear weapons test series and from leukemia among participants at the SMOKY test.

Authors:  Glyn G Caldwell; Matthew M Zack; Michael T Mumma; Henry Falk; Clark W Heath; John E Till; Heidi Chen; John D Boice
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.394

2.  Seeing through a glass darkly and taking the next right steps.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.

Authors:  Deepa M Sridharan; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Steve R Blattnig; Sylvain V Costes; Paul W Doetsch; William S Dynan; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Yared Kidane; Amy Kronenberg; Mamta D Naidu; Leif E Peterson; Ianik Plante; Artem L Ponomarev; Janapriya Saha; Antoine M Snijders; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Jonathan Tang; Erica Werner; Janice M Pluth
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-21

4.  ESTIMATION OF ORGAN DOSES AMONG DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL RADIATION WORKERS IN SOUTH KOREA.

Authors:  Yeongchull Choi; Eun Shil Cha; Ye Jin Bang; Seulki Ko; Mina Ha; Choonsik Lee; Won Jin Lee
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  NCRP Program Area Committee 6: Radiation Measurements and Dosimetry.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Gary H Zeman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Cohort profile - MSK radiation workers: a feasibility study to establish a deceased worker sub-cohort as part of a multicenter medical radiation worker component in the million person study of low-dose radiation health effects.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Meghan Woods; Daniel Miodownik; Brian Serencsits; Brian Quinn; Michael Bellamy; Craig Yoder; Xiaolin Liang; John D Boice; Jonine Bernstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Dosimetry for the study of medical radiation workers with a focus on the mean absorbed dose to the lung, brain and other organs.

Authors:  Robert C Yoder; Lawrence T Dauer; Stephen Balter; John D Boice; Helen A Grogan; Michael T Mumma; Christopher N Passmore; Lawrence N Rothenberg; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The Likelihood of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Genetic Disease (Transgenerational Effects) from Exposure to Radioactive Fallout from the 1945 Trinity Atomic Bomb Test.

Authors:  John D Boice
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.922

9.  Reconstruction of Radiation Dose Received by Diagnostic Radiologic Technologists in Korea.

Authors:  Yeongchull Choi; Jaeyoung Kim; Jung Jeung Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Won Jin Lee
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2016-08-23

10.  Jagged-2 enhances immunomodulatory activity in adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Zhu Xishan; Zhang Bin; Zhao Haiyue; Dou Xiaowei; Bai Jingwen; Zhang Guojun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.