Literature DB >> 25162420

Nuclear medicine practices in the 1950s through the mid-1970s and occupational radiation doses to technologists from diagnostic radioisotope procedures.

Vladimir Drozdovitch1, Aaron B Brill, Fred A Mettler, William M Beckner, Stanley J Goldsmith, Milton D Gross, Marguerite T Hays, Peter T Kirchner, James K Langan, Richard C Reba, Gary T Smith, André Bouville, Martha S Linet, Dunstana R Melo, Choonsik Lee, Steven L Simon.   

Abstract

Data on occupational radiation exposure from nuclear medicine procedures for the time period of the 1950s through the 1970s is important for retrospective health risk studies of medical personnel who conducted those activities. However, limited information is available on occupational exposure received by physicians and technologists who performed nuclear medicine procedures during those years. To better understand and characterize historical radiation exposures to technologists, the authors collected information on nuclear medicine practices in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. To collect historical data needed to reconstruct doses to technologists, a focus group interview was held with experts who began using radioisotopes in medicine in the 1950s and the 1960s. Typical protocols and descriptions of clinical practices of diagnostic radioisotope procedures were defined by the focus group and were used to estimate occupational doses received by personnel, per nuclear medicine procedure, conducted in the 1950s to 1960s using radiopharmaceuticals available at that time. The radionuclide activities in the organs of the reference patient were calculated using the biokinetic models described in ICRP Publication 53. Air kerma rates as a function of distance from a reference patient were calculated by Monte Carlo radiation transport calculations using a hybrid computational phantom. Estimates of occupational doses to nuclear medicine technologists per procedure were found to vary from less than 0.01 μSv (thyroid scan with 1.85 MBq of administered I-iodide) to 0.4 μSv (brain scan with 26 MBq of Hg-chlormerodin). Occupational doses for the same diagnostic procedures starting in the mid-1960s but using Tc were also estimated. The doses estimated in this study show that the introduction of Tc resulted in an increase in occupational doses per procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25162420      PMCID: PMC4147674          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  17 in total

1.  Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy.

Authors:  Isabella McLafferty
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Radiation doses from nuclear medicine patients to an imaging technologist: relation to ICRP recommendations for pregnant workers.

Authors:  E A Clarke; W H Thomson; A Notghi; L K Harding
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Estimating historical radiation doses to a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Michele Morin Doody; James Neton; Thurman Wenzl; Patricia Stewart; Aparna K Mohan; R Craig Yoder; Michael Hauptmann; D Michal Freedman; John Cardarelli; H Amy Feng; André Bouville; Martha Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A health survey of radiologic technologists.

Authors:  J D Boice; J S Mandel; M M Doody; R C Yoder; R McGowan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Hybrid computational phantoms representing the reference adult male and adult female: construction and applications for retrospective dosimetry.

Authors:  Jorge L Hurtado; Choonsik Lee; Daniel Lodwick; Timothy Goede; Jonathan L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Worker dose analysis based on real time dosimetry.

Authors:  N L McElroy
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Comparison of point, line and volume dose calculations for exposure to nuclear medicine therapy patients.

Authors:  Albérico B de Carvalho; Michael G Stabin; Jeffry A Siegel; John Hunt
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Daniel Lodwick; Jorge Hurtado; Deanna Pafundi; Jonathan L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Population characteristics and absorbed dose to the population from nuclear medicine: United States--1982.

Authors:  F A Mettler; J H Christie; A G Williams; R D Moseley; C A Kelsey
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Organ-specific external dose coefficients and protective apron transmission factors for historical dose reconstruction for medical personnel.

Authors:  Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.922

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A New Era of Low-Dose Radiation Epidemiology.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Preetha Rajaraman; Estelle Ntowe; Amy Berrington de González
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

2.  A U.S. Multicenter Study of Recorded Occupational Radiation Badge Doses in Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; R Craig Yoder; Christopher Passmore; Marie-Odile Bernier; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Use of radiopharmaceuticals in diagnostic nuclear medicine in the United States: 1960-2010.

Authors:  Vladimir Drozdovitch; Aaron B Brill; Ronald J Callahan; Jeffrey A Clanton; Allegra DePietro; Stanley J Goldsmith; Bennett S Greenspan; Milton D Gross; Marguerite T Hays; Stephen C Moore; James A Ponto; Walton W Shreeve; Dunstana R Melo; Martha S Linet; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Estimated Organ Doses to Patients from Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Examinations over Five Decades: 1960-2010.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Steven L Simon; Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Dunstana R Melo
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Historical Patterns in the Types of Procedures Performed and Radiation Safety Practices Used in Nuclear Medicine From 1945-2009.

Authors:  Miriam E Van Dyke; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Michele M Doody; Hyeyeun Lim; Norman E Bolus; Steven L Simon; Bruce H Alexander; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Behavior and Food Consumption Pattern of the French Polynesian Population in the 1960s -1970s.

Authors:  Vladimir Drozdovitch; André Bouville; Tetuaura Tetuanui; Marc Taquet; Jacques Gardon; Constance Xhaard; Yan Ren; Françoise Doyon; Florent de Vathaire
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-12-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.