Literature DB >> 21605944

Megavoltage image-based dynamic multileaf collimator tracking of a NiTi stent in porcine lungs on a linear accelerator.

Per R Poulsen1, Jesper Carl, Jane Nielsen, Martin S Nielsen, Jakob B Thomsen, Henrik K Jensen, Benedict Kjærgaard, Peter R Zepernick, Esben Worm, Walther Fledelius, Byungchul Cho, Amit Sawant, Dan Ruan, Paul J Keall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy and potential limitations of MV image-based dynamic multileaf collimator (DMLC) tracking in a porcine model on a linear accelerator. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A thermo-expandable NiTi stent designed for kilovoltage (kV) X-ray visualization of lung lesions was inserted into the bronchia of three anaesthetized Göttingen minipigs. A four-dimensional computed tomography scan was used for planning a five-field conformal treatment with circular multileaf collimator (MLC) apertures. A 22.5 Gy single fraction treatment was delivered to the pigs. The peak-to-peak stent motion was 3 to 8 mm, with breathing periods of 1.2 to 4 s. Before treatment, X-ray images were used for image-guided setup based on the stent. During treatment delivery, continuous megavoltage (MV) portal images were acquired at 7.5 Hz. The stent was segmented in the images and used for continuous adaptation of the MLC aperture. Offline, the tracking error in beam's eye view of the treatment beam was calculated for each MV image as the difference between the MLC aperture center and the segmented stent position. The standard deviations of the systematic error Σ and the random error σ were determined and compared with the would-be errors for a nontracking treatment with pretreatment image-guided setup.
RESULTS: Reliable stent segmentation was obtained for 11 of 15 fields. Segmentation failures occurred when image contrast was dominated by overlapping anatomical structures (ribs, diaphragm) rather than by the stent, which was designed for kV rather than MV X-ray visibility. For the 11 fields with reliable segmentation, Σ was 0.5 mm/0.4 mm in the two imager directions, whereas σ was 0.5 mm/1.1 mm. Without tracking, Σ and σ would have been 1.7 mm/1.4 mm and 0.8 mm/1.4 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: For the first time, in vivo DMLC tracking has been demonstrated on a linear accelerator showing the potential for improved targeting accuracy. The study mimicked the envisioned patient workflow of future patient treatments. Clinical implementation of MV image-based tracking would require markers designed for MV visibility.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21605944      PMCID: PMC3162131          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

1.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.

Authors:  M van Herk; P Remeijer; C Rasch; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Motion adaptive x-ray therapy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  P J Keall; V R Kini; S S Vedam; R Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Organ motion and its management.

Authors:  K M Langen; D T Jones
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Detailed analysis of latencies in image-based dynamic MLC tracking.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Byungchul Cho; Amit Sawant; Dan Ruan; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Four-dimensional inverse treatment planning with inclusion of implanted fiducials in IMRT segmented fields.

Authors:  Yunzhi Ma; Louis Lee; O Keshet; Paul Keall; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Kernel density estimation-based real-time prediction for respiratory motion.

Authors:  Dan Ruan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Dynamic multileaf collimator tracking of respiratory target motion based on a single kilovoltage imager during arc radiotherapy.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Byungchul Cho; Dan Ruan; Amit Sawant; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Management of three-dimensional intrafraction motion through real-time DMLC tracking.

Authors:  Amit Sawant; Raghu Venkat; Vikram Srivastava; David Carlson; Sergey Povzner; Herb Cattell; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Synchronized moving aperture radiation therapy (SMART): average tumour trajectory for lung patients.

Authors:  Toni Neicu; Hiroki Shirato; Yvette Seppenwoolde; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  First demonstration of combined kV/MV image-guided real-time dynamic multileaf-collimator target tracking.

Authors:  Byungchul Cho; Per R Poulsen; Alex Sloutsky; Amit Sawant; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  6 in total

1.  The first clinical implementation of electromagnetic transponder-guided MLC tracking.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Emma Colvill; Ricky O'Brien; Jin Aun Ng; Per Rugaard Poulsen; Thomas Eade; Andrew Kneebone; Jeremy T Booth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Review of Real-Time 3-Dimensional Image Guided Radiation Therapy on Standard-Equipped Cancer Radiation Therapy Systems: Are We at the Tipping Point for the Era of Real-Time Radiation Therapy?

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Doan Trang Nguyen; Ricky O'Brien; Pengpeng Zhang; Laura Happersett; Jenny Bertholet; Per R Poulsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Mai Lykkegaard Schmidt; Paul Keall; Esben Schjodt Worm; Walther Fledelius; Lone Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Time and frequency to observe fiducial markers in MLC-modulated fields during prostate IMRT/VMAT beam delivery.

Authors:  Qianqian Xu; Xu Tong; Muhan Lin; Xiaoming Chen; Ahmed ElDib; Teh Lin; Lili Chen; C-M Charlie Ma
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Tracking, gating, free-breathing, which technique to use for lung stereotactic treatments? A dosimetric comparison.

Authors:  Jessica Prunaretty; Pierre Boisselier; Norbert Aillères; Olivier Riou; Sebastien Simeon; Ludovic Bedos; David Azria; Pascal Fenoglietto
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-11-24

6.  IMRT treatment planning on 4D geometries for the era of dynamic MLC tracking.

Authors:  Yelin Suh; Walter Murray; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-12-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.