Literature DB >> 21604835

Glossopharyngeal nerve transection impairs unconditioned avoidance of diverse bitter stimuli in rats.

Laura C Geran1, Susan P Travers.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence of heterogeneity among responses to bitter stimuli at the peripheral, central and behavioral levels. For instance, the glossopharyngeal (GL) nerve and neurons receiving its projections are more responsive to bitter stimuli than the chorda tympani (CT) nerve, and this is particularly true for some bitter stimuli like PROP & cycloheximide that stimulate the GL to a far greater extent. Given this information, we hypothesized that cutting the GL would have a greater effect on behavioral avoidance of cycloheximide and PROP than quinine and denatonium, which also stimulate the CT, albeit to a lesser degree than salts and acids. Forty male SD rats were divided into four surgery groups: bilateral GL transection (GLX), chorda tympani transection (CTX), SHAM surgery, and combined transection (CTX + GLX). Postsurgical avoidance functions were generated for the four bitter stimuli using a brief-access test. GLX significantly compromised avoidance compared to both CTX and SHAM groups for all stimuli (p < .02), while CTX and SHAM groups did not differ. Contrary to our hypothesis, GLX had a greater effect on quinine than cycloheximide (mean shift of 1.02 vs. 0.27 log10 units). Moreover, combined CTX + GLX transection shifted the concentration-response function further than GLX alone for every stimulus except cycloheximide (ps < .03), suggesting that the GSP nerve is capable of maintaining avoidance of this stimulus to a large degree. This hypothesis is supported by reports of cycloheximide-responsive cells with GSP-innervated receptive fields in the NST and PBN. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21604835      PMCID: PMC3779807          DOI: 10.1037/a0023934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  45 in total

1.  Taste receptor cells that discriminate between bitter stimuli.

Authors:  A Caicedo; S D Roper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Expression of bitter taste receptors of the T2R family in the gastrointestinal tract and enteroendocrine STC-1 cells.

Authors:  S Vincent Wu; Nora Rozengurt; Moon Yang; Steven H Young; James Sinnett-Smith; Enrique Rozengurt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rats fail to discriminate quinine from denatonium: implications for the neural coding of bitter-tasting compounds.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Stacy L Kopka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Covariation in individuals' sensitivities to bitter compounds: evidence supporting multiple receptor/transduction mechanisms.

Authors:  J F Delwiche; Z Buletic; P A Breslin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

5.  Learning-based recovery from perceptual impairment in salt discrimination after permanently altered peripheral gustatory input.

Authors:  Ginger Blonde; Enshe Jiang; Mircea Garcea; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Glossopharyngeal nerve regeneration is essential for the complete recovery of quinine-stimulated oromotor rejection behaviors and central patterns of neuronal activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract in the rat.

Authors:  C T King; M Garcea; A C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A novel family of mammalian taste receptors.

Authors:  E Adler; M A Hoon; K L Mueller; J Chandrashekar; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Diverse bitter stimuli elicit highly similar patterns of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  C Y Chan; J E Yoo; S P Travers
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  The distinctiveness of ionic and nonionic bitter stimuli.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Brian P Bouverat; Bruce I MacKinnon; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-01

10.  Comparison of the responses of the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves to taste stimuli in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Vicktoria Danilova; Göran Hellekant
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mouth rinsing with a bitter solution without ingestion does not improve sprint cycling performance.

Authors:  Sharon Gam; Mark Tan; Kym J Guelfi; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Temporal signatures of taste quality driven by active sensing.

Authors:  Dustin M Graham; Chengsan Sun; David L Hill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Differential neural representation of oral ethanol by central taste-sensitive neurons in ethanol-preferring and genetically heterogeneous rats.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon; David M Wilson; Susan M Brasser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Chorda tympani nerve modulates the rat's avoidance of calcium chloride.

Authors:  Glen J Golden; Anna Voznesenskaya; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-12-30

5.  Mouse Parabrachial Neurons Signal a Relationship between Bitter Taste and Nociceptive Stimuli.

Authors:  Jinrong Li; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Bitter taste stimuli induce differential neural codes in mouse brain.

Authors:  David M Wilson; John D Boughter; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.