Literature DB >> 14741226

The distinctiveness of ionic and nonionic bitter stimuli.

Marion E Frank1, Brian P Bouverat, Bruce I MacKinnon, Thomas P Hettinger.   

Abstract

The diverse chemical structures of stimuli that are bitter to humans suggest a need for multiple bitter receptors. Reactions of golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) to 1 mM quinine hydrochloride, 3 mM denatonium benzoate, 180 mM magnesium sulfate, 30-100 mM caffeine, and 1-1.5 mM sucrose octaacetate (SOA) were studied to address whether there are multiple sensations elicited by bitter stimuli. Methods included behavioral generalization of LiCl-induced conditioned taste aversions (CTAs), intake preference tests, and electrophysiological recordings from the chorda tympani (CT) nerve. The five compounds, all bitter to humans, were all innately aversive to hamsters. CTA for the ionic quinine.HCl, denatonium benzoate, and MgSO(4) mutually cross-generalized and these ionic compounds were effective CT stimuli. Yet, the hamsters were much less sensitive to denatonium than humans, requiring a 100,000 times higher concentration for detection. CTA for nonionic caffeine and SOA did not cross-generalize to quinine or the other two ionic stimuli and these nonionic compounds were not effective CT stimuli. SOA and caffeine may elicit aversive reflexes or systemic reactions rather than taste sensations in the animals. Thus, the three ionic and two nonionic compounds form separate aversive stimulus classes in hamsters, neither of which appears to be a close homologue of the human bitter taste.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14741226     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  14 in total

1.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 3.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Temperature Influences Chorda Tympani Nerve Responses to Sweet, Salty, Sour, Umami, and Bitter Stimuli in Mice.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Joseph M Breza; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Glossopharyngeal nerve transection impairs unconditioned avoidance of diverse bitter stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Laura C Geran; Susan P Travers
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Cycloheximide: no ordinary bitter stimulus.

Authors:  Thomas P Hettinger; Bradley K Formaker; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  Taste coding after selective inhibition by chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Miao-Fen Wang; Lawrence E Marks; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Salt taste inhibition by cathodal current.

Authors:  Thomas P Hettinger; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Gustatory responsiveness to six bitter tastants in three species of nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Rosa Mariela Rivas Bautista; Laura Teresa Hernandez Salazar
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.