Literature DB >> 24872546

Temporal signatures of taste quality driven by active sensing.

Dustin M Graham1, Chengsan Sun2, David L Hill2.   

Abstract

Animals actively acquire sensory information from the outside world, with rodents sniffing to smell and whisking to feel. Licking, a rapid motor sequence used for gustation, serves as the primary means of controlling stimulus access to taste receptors in the mouth. Using a novel taste-quality discrimination task in head-restrained mice, we measured and compared reaction times to four basic taste qualities (salt, sour, sweet, and bitter) and found that certain taste qualities are perceived inherently faster than others, driven by the precise biomechanics of licking and functional organization of the peripheral gustatory system. The minimum time required for accurate perception was strongly dependent on taste quality, ranging from the sensory-motor limits of a single lick (salt, ∼100 ms) to several sampling cycles (bitter, >500 ms). Further, disruption of sensory input from the anterior tongue significantly impaired the speed of perception of some taste qualities, with little effect on others. Overall, our results show that active sensing may play an important role in shaping the timing of taste-quality representations and perception in the gustatory system.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/347398-14$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24872546      PMCID: PMC4035510          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0213-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

Review 1.  Gustatory processing is dynamic and distributed.

Authors:  Donald B Katz; Miguel A L Nicolelis; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Taste stimuli: quality coding time.

Authors:  B P Halpern; D N Tapper
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Different characteristics of gustatory responses between the greater superficial petrosal and chorda tympani nerves in the rat.

Authors:  S Harada; T Yamamoto; K Yamaguchi; Y Kasahara
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Learning-related fine-scale specificity imaged in motor cortex circuits of behaving mice.

Authors:  Takaki Komiyama; Takashi R Sato; Daniel H O'Connor; Ying-Xin Zhang; Daniel Huber; Bryan M Hooks; Mariano Gabitto; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Control of prestimulus activity related to improved sensory coding within a discrimination task.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshida; Donald B Katz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Glossopharyngeal nerve regeneration is essential for the complete recovery of quinine-stimulated oromotor rejection behaviors and central patterns of neuronal activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract in the rat.

Authors:  C T King; M Garcea; A C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Perception of sniff phase in mouse olfaction.

Authors:  Matthew Smear; Roman Shusterman; Rodney O'Connor; Thomas Bozza; Dmitry Rinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A high-throughput screening procedure for identifying mice with aberrant taste and oromotor function.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Jodi Gresack; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Response latency to lingual taste stimulation distinguishes neuron types within the geniculate ganglion.

Authors:  Joseph M Breza; Alexandre A Nikonov; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The cells and peripheral representation of sodium taste in mice.

Authors:  Jayaram Chandrashekar; Christina Kuhn; Yuki Oka; David A Yarmolinsky; Edith Hummler; Nicholas J P Ryba; Charles S Zuker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Recognizing Taste: Coding Patterns Along the Neural Axis in Mammals.

Authors:  Kathrin Ohla; Ryusuke Yoshida; Stephen D Roper; Patricia M Di Lorenzo; Jonathan D Victor; John D Boughter; Max Fletcher; Donald B Katz; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Modulation of taste processing by temperature.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Temperature systematically modifies neural activity for sweet taste.

Authors:  David M Wilson; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Layer- and Cell Type-Specific Response Properties of Gustatory Cortex Neurons in Awake Mice.

Authors:  Gulce Nazli Dikecligil; Dustin M Graham; Il Memming Park; Alfredo Fontanini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Single and population coding of taste in the gustatory cortex of awake mice.

Authors:  David Levitan; Jian-You Lin; Joseph Wachutka; Narendra Mukherjee; Sacha B Nelson; Donald B Katz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Cortical processing of chemosensory and hedonic features of taste in active licking mice.

Authors:  Cecilia G Bouaichi; Roberto Vincis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  LiCl-induced sickness modulates rat gustatory cortical responses.

Authors:  Bradly T Stone; Jian-You Lin; Abuzar Mahmood; Alden J Sanford; Donald B Katz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 9.593

8.  Sweet and bitter taste in the brain of awake behaving animals.

Authors:  Yueqing Peng; Sarah Gillis-Smith; Hao Jin; Dimitri Tränkner; Nicholas J P Ryba; Charles S Zuker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.