Literature DB >> 25236837

Mouth rinsing with a bitter solution without ingestion does not improve sprint cycling performance.

Sharon Gam1, Mark Tan, Kym J Guelfi, Paul A Fournier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, we have shown that combining mouth rinsing with the ingestion of a 2 mM quinine solution immediately before a 30-s cycling sprint significantly improves performance. However, the strong bitterness of such a solution produces an unpleasant taste and evokes nausea at higher concentrations. Given the possibility that mouth rinsing with quinine without ingesting it may not produce nausea, a mouth rinse only protocol may be a more practical approach to administer quinine for improving exercise performance. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether mouth rinsing with quinine without ingesting it improves 30-s sprint cycling performance.
METHODS: Twelve competitive male cyclists performed a 30-s maximal cycling sprint immediately after rinsing their mouth for 10 s with either a 10 mM bitter quinine solution (QUI), plain water (WAT), a 7.1 % w/v sweet glucose solution (GLU), or no solution at all (control; CON). Sprint performance was assessed, and heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion and blood variables were measured pre- and post-exercise.
RESULTS: Mean power output during the 30-s sprint (QUI 888 ± 38; CON 873 ± 39; WAT 885 ± 37; GLU 873 ± 42 W; p = 0.431) as well as peak power (QUI 1230 ± 61; CON 1,208 ± 65; WAT 1,220 ± 70; GLU 1,202 ± 59 W; p = 0.690) were similar between the four conditions. There were no significant differences in any other performance measures, heart rate, subjective ratings or blood variables between conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Mouth rinsing with a bitter tasting quinine solution without ingestion does not improve 30-s sprint cycling performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25236837     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2987-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  27 in total

Review 1.  Oral carbohydrate sensing and exercise performance.

Authors:  Asker E Jeukendrup; Edward S Chambers
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 2.  Methods to standardize dietary intake before performance testing.

Authors:  Nikki A Jeacocke; Louise M Burke
Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Gustatory signaling in the periphery: detection, transmission, and modulation of taste information.

Authors:  Mayu Niki; Ryusuke Yoshida; Shingo Takai; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.233

4.  A complex relationship among chemical concentration, detection threshold, and suprathreshold intensity of bitter compounds.

Authors:  Russell S J Keast; Jessica Roper
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Mouth rinsing and ingesting a bitter solution improves sprint cycling performance.

Authors:  Sharon Gam; Kym J Guelfi; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Habituation and dishabituation of human salivary response.

Authors:  L H Epstein; J S Rodefer; L Wisniewski; A R Caggiula
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-05

7.  Effect of a carbohydrate mouth rinse on maximal sprint performance in competitive male cyclists.

Authors:  E Chong; K J Guelfi; P A Fournier
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.319

8.  Assessment of the multiple dimensions of nausea: the Nausea Profile (NP).

Authors:  E R Muth; R M Stern; J F Thayer; K L Koch
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Gustatory expression pattern of the human TAS2R bitter receptor gene family reveals a heterogenous population of bitter responsive taste receptor cells.

Authors:  Maik Behrens; Susann Foerster; Frauke Staehler; Jan-Dirk Raguse; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mouth rinsing and ingestion of a bitter-tasting solution increases corticomotor excitability in male competitive cyclists.

Authors:  Sharon Gam; Kym J Guelfi; Geoff Hammond; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  New Insights into Enhancing Maximal Exercise Performance Through the Use of a Bitter Tastant.

Authors:  Sharon Gam; Kym J Guelfi; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  A Narrative Review of Current Concerns and Future Perspectives of the Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Effects on Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Vitor de Salles Painelli; Cayque Brietzke; Paulo Estevão Franco-Alvarenga; Raul Canestri; Ítalo Vinícius; Flávio Oliveira Pires
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 4.  Can taste be ergogenic?

Authors:  Russ Best; Kerin McDonald; Philip Hurst; Craig Pickering
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  A Pre-Exercise Dose of Muscle Sentry® has no Effect on Performing Repeated Leg Press Sets to Failure.

Authors:  Trezlyn M Bartschi; David C Sanders; Tyler M Farney; Joke Kokkonen; Arnold G Nelson
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-11-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.