Literature DB >> 21603125

Lexical and Post-Lexical Complexity Effects on Eye Movements in Reading.

Tessa Warren1, Erik D Reichle, Nikole D Patson.   

Abstract

The current study investigated how a post-lexical complexity manipulation followed by a lexical complexity manipulation affects eye movements during reading. Both manipulations caused disruption in all measures on the manipulated words, but the patterns of spill-over differed. Critically, the effects of the two kinds of manipulations did not interact, and there was no evidence that post-lexical processing difficulty delayed lexical processing on the next word (c.f. Henderson & Ferreira, 1990). This suggests that post-lexical processing of one word and lexical processing of the next can proceed independently and likely in parallel. This finding is consistent with the assumptions of the E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading (Reichle, Warren, & McConnell, 2009).

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21603125      PMCID: PMC3097123     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  13 in total

1.  An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  Scott A McDonald; R H S Carpenter; Richard C Shillcock
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-02

4.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.

Authors:  H H Schilling; K Rayner; J I Chumbley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

5.  Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial complexity.

Authors:  Daniel Grodner; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-03-04

6.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: evidence from eye movements and E-Z Reader.

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Sarah J White; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-02-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Parafoveal preview during reading: effects of sentence position.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Tessa Warren; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers.

Authors:  Christina Marx; Stefan Hawelka; Sarah Schuster; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  An investigation of parafoveal masks with the incremental boundary paradigm.

Authors:  Florian Hutzler; Sarah Schuster; Christina Marx; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Spill the load: Mixed evidence for a foveal load effect, reliable evidence for a spillover effect in eye-movement control during reading.

Authors:  Eva Findelsberger; Florian Hutzler; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.