Literature DB >> 21500948

Parafoveal preview during reading: effects of sentence position.

Sarah J White1, Tessa Warren, Erik D Reichle.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined parafoveal preview for words located in the middle of sentences and at sentence boundaries. Parafoveal processing was shown to occur for words at sentence-initial, mid-sentence, and sentence-final positions. Both Experiments 1 and 2 showed reduced effects of preview on regressions out for sentence-initial words. In addition, Experiment 2 showed reduced preview effects on first-pass reading times for sentence-initial words. These effects of sentence position on preview could result from either reduced parafoveal processing for sentence-initial words or other processes specific to word reading at sentence boundaries. In addition to the effects of preview, the experiments also demonstrate variability in the effects of sentence wrap-up on different reading measures, indicating that the presence and time course of wrap-up effects may be modulated by text-specific factors. We also report simulations of Experiment 2 using version 10 of E-Z Reader (Reichle, Warren, & McConnell, 2009), designed to explore the possible mechanisms underlying parafoveal preview at sentence boundaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21500948      PMCID: PMC3140553          DOI: 10.1037/a0022190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  32 in total

1.  The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; G Kambe; S A Duffy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-11

2.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Parafoveal processing in word recognition.

Authors:  A Kennedy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

Review 4.  Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Raymond Bertram; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

5.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

7.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; D A Balota; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

2.  Aging, parafoveal preview, and semantic integration in sentence processing: testing the cognitive workload of wrap-up.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-01-09

3.  Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.