Literature DB >> 21602554

Optimal inference explains the perceptual coherence of visual motion stimuli.

James H Hedges1, Alan A Stocker, Eero P Simoncelli.   

Abstract

The local spatiotemporal pattern of light on the retina is often consistent with a single translational velocity which may also be interpreted as a superposition of spatial patterns translating with different velocities. Human perception reflects such interpretations, as can be demonstrated using stimuli constructed from a superposition of two drifting gratings. Depending on a variety of parameters, these stimuli may be perceived as a coherently moving plaid pattern or as two transparent gratings moving in different directions. Here, we propose a quantitative model that explains how and why such interpretations are selected. An observer's percept corresponds to the most probable interpretation of noisy measurements of local image motion, based on separate prior beliefs about the speed and singularity of visual motion. This model accounts for human perceptual interpretations across a broad range of angles and speeds. With optimized parameters, its components are consistent with previous results in motion perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21602554      PMCID: PMC3718884          DOI: 10.1167/11.6.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  40 in total

1.  Coherence and transparency of moving plaids composed of Fourier and non-Fourier gratings.

Authors:  J D Victor; M M Conte
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  Influence of colour on the perception of coherent motion.

Authors:  J Krauskopf; B Farell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Motion coherency rules are form-cue invariant.

Authors:  G R Stoner; T D Albright
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism aftereffect: identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Sato; Taro Toyoizumi; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 5.  Biological image motion processing: a review.

Authors:  K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing.

Authors:  D Marr; S Ullman
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1981-03-06

7.  Factors influencing velocity coding in the human visual system.

Authors:  G A Orban; J de Wolf; H Maes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  A local mechanism for differential velocity detection.

Authors:  S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Motion coherence across different chromatic axes.

Authors:  S J Cropper; K T Mullen; D R Badcock
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Causal inference in multisensory perception.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Ulrik Beierholm; Wei Ji Ma; Steven Quartz; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  The brain uses adaptive internal models of scene statistics for sensorimotor estimation and planning.

Authors:  Oh-Sang Kwon; David C Knill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptation disrupts motion integration in the primate dorsal stream.

Authors:  Carlyn A Patterson; Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation to visual cortex induces suboptimal introspection.

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Jeremy Fesi; Namema Amendi; Jeffrey D Knotts; Hakwan Lau; Tony Ro
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Cortical correlates of human motion perception biases.

Authors:  Brett Vintch; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Hierarchical structure is employed by humans during visual motion perception.

Authors:  Johannes Bill; Hrag Pailian; Samuel J Gershman; Jan Drugowitsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Near-optimal integration of orientation information across saccades.

Authors:  Elad Ganmor; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Animal models and measures of perceptual processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Steven J Siegel; John C Talpos; Mark A Geyer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Apparent motion perception in patients with paranoid schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lia Lira Olivier Sanders; Walter de Millas; Andreas Heinz; Norbert Kathmann; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Illusory movement of stationary stimuli in the visual periphery: evidence for a strong centrifugal prior in motion processing.

Authors:  Ruyuan Zhang; Oh-Sang Kwon; Duje Tadin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Anisotropic connectivity implements motion-based prediction in a spiking neural network.

Authors:  Bernhard A Kaplan; Anders Lansner; Guillaume S Masson; Laurent U Perrinet
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.