Literature DB >> 28646672

Transcranial magnetic stimulation to visual cortex induces suboptimal introspection.

Megan A K Peters1, Jeremy Fesi2, Namema Amendi2, Jeffrey D Knotts3, Hakwan Lau4, Tony Ro2.   

Abstract

Blindsight patients with damage to the visual cortex can discriminate objects but report no conscious visual experience. This provides an intriguing opportunity to allow the study of subjective awareness in isolation from objective performance capacity. However, blindsight is rare, so one promising way to induce the effect in neurologically intact observers is to apply transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the visual cortex. Here, we used a recently-developed criterion-free method to conclusively rule out an important alternative interpretation of TMS-induced performance without awareness: that TMS-induced blindsight may be just due to conservative reporting biases for conscious perception. Critically, using this criterion-free paradigm we have previously shown that introspective judgments were optimal even under visual masking. However, here under TMS, observers were suboptimal, as if they were metacognitively blind to the visual disturbances caused by TMS. We argue that metacognitive judgments depend on observers' internal statistical models of their own perceptual systems, and introspective suboptimality arises when external perturbations abruptly make those models invalid - a phenomenon that may also be happening in actual blindsight.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian ideal observer; Blindsight; Metacognition; Noninvasive neuromodulation; Unconscious perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28646672      PMCID: PMC5541901          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  67 in total

1.  Relative blindsight in normal observers and the neural correlate of visual consciousness.

Authors:  Hakwan C Lau; Richard E Passingham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Unconscious vision in action.

Authors:  Tony Ro
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  The case for characterising type-2 blindsight as a genuinely visual phenomenon.

Authors:  Robert Foley
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-10-22

4.  Blindsight in normal observers.

Authors:  F C Kolb; J Braun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Measuring consciousness: is one measure better than the other?

Authors:  Kristian Sandberg; Bert Timmermans; Morten Overgaard; Axel Cleeremans
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-02-04

6.  Optimal inference explains the perceptual coherence of visual motion stimuli.

Authors:  James H Hedges; Alan A Stocker; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability.

Authors:  Sophie Deneve
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Who's afraid of response bias?

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Tony Ro; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2016-02-27

10.  Brain-stimulation induced blindsight: unconscious vision or response bias?

Authors:  David A Lloyd; Arman Abrahamyan; Justin A Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Humans incorporate attention-dependent uncertainty into perceptual decisions and confidence.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; William T Adler; Marisa Carrasco; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Variance misperception under skewed empirical noise statistics explains overconfidence in the visual periphery.

Authors:  Charles J Winter; Megan A K Peters
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Marion Rouault; Andrew McWilliams; Micah G Allen; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Personal Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-12

5.  Normal observers show no evidence for blindsight in facial emotion perception.

Authors:  Sivananda Rajananda; Jeanette Zhu; Megan A K Peters
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2020-12-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.