Literature DB >> 23440185

The brain uses adaptive internal models of scene statistics for sensorimotor estimation and planning.

Oh-Sang Kwon1, David C Knill.   

Abstract

Because of uncertainty and noise, the brain should use accurate internal models of the statistics of objects in scenes to interpret sensory signals. Moreover, the brain should adapt its internal models to the statistics within local stimulus contexts. Consider the problem of hitting a baseball. The impoverished nature of the visual information available makes it imperative that batters use knowledge of the temporal statistics and history of previous pitches to accurately estimate pitch speed. Using a laboratory analog of hitting a baseball, we tested the hypothesis that the brain uses adaptive internal models of the statistics of object speeds to plan hand movements to intercept moving objects. We fit Bayesian observer models to subjects' performance to estimate the statistical environments in which subjects' performance would be ideal and compared the estimated statistics with the true statistics of stimuli in an experiment. A first experiment showed that subjects accurately estimated and used the variance of object speeds in a stimulus set to time hitting behavior but also showed serial biases that are suboptimal for stimuli that were uncorrelated over time. A second experiment showed that the strength of the serial biases depended on the temporal correlations within a stimulus set, even when the biases were estimated from uncorrelated stimulus pairs subsampled from the larger set. Taken together, the results show that subjects adapted their internal models of the variance and covariance of object speeds within a stimulus set to plan interceptive movements but retained a bias to positive correlations.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23440185      PMCID: PMC3600457          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1214869110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

2.  Rapidly learned stimulus expectations alter perception of motion.

Authors:  Matthew Chalk; Aaron R Seitz; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian?

Authors:  Kevin M Sailor; Miriam Antoine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

4.  Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task.

Authors:  P R DeLucia; G W Liddell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  How each movement changes the next: an experimental and theoretical study of fast adaptive priors in reaching.

Authors:  Timothy Verstynen; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity.

Authors:  E Kowler; S P McKee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Attention and selection for predictive smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  E Poliakoff; C J S Collins; G R Barnes
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-21

9.  Subsecond timing in primates: comparison of interval production between human subjects and rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Wilbert Zarco; Hugo Merchant; Luis Prado; Juan Carlos Mendez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Optimal inference explains the perceptual coherence of visual motion stimuli.

Authors:  James H Hedges; Alan A Stocker; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  19 in total

1.  Bayesian inference in auditory scenes.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

2.  Functional correlates of likelihood and prior representations in a virtual distance task.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; Kelly Michaelis; James C Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Generalization of prior information for rapid Bayesian time estimation.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw; David J Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Young children combine sensory cues with learned information in a statistically efficient manner: But task complexity matters.

Authors:  Vikranth R Bejjanki; Emily R Randrup; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  Do People Take Stimulus Correlations into Account in Visual Search?

Authors:  Manisha Bhardwaj; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation to visual cortex induces suboptimal introspection.

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Jeremy Fesi; Namema Amendi; Jeffrey D Knotts; Hakwan Lau; Tony Ro
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Disrupting Short-Term Memory Maintenance in Premotor Cortex Affects Serial Dependence in Visuomotor Integration.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Learning and inference using complex generative models in a spatial localization task.

Authors:  Vikranth R Bejjanki; David C Knill; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Continuous carryover of temporal context dissociates response bias from perceptual influence for duration.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; James C Thompson; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Adaptive reliance on the most stable sensory predictions enhances perceptual feature extraction of moving stimuli.

Authors:  Neeraj Kumar; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.