Literature DB >> 17970656

Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism aftereffect: identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli.

Yoshiyuki Sato1, Taro Toyoizumi, Kazuyuki Aihara.   

Abstract

We study a computational model of audiovisual integration by setting a Bayesian observer that localizes visual and auditory stimuli without presuming the binding of audiovisual information. The observer adopts the maximum a posteriori approach to estimate the physically delivered position or timing of presented stimuli, simultaneously judging whether they are from the same source or not. Several experimental results on the perception of spatial unity and the ventriloquism effect can be explained comprehensively if the subjects in the experiments are regarded as Bayesian observers who try to accurately locate the stimulus. Moreover, by adaptively changing the inner representation of the Bayesian observer in terms of experience, we show that our model reproduces perceived spatial frame shifts due to the audiovisual adaptation known as the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970656     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.12.3335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  68 in total

1.  Effect of eye position during human visual-vestibular integration of heading perception.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Audiovisual temporal capture underlies flash fusion.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Computing an optimal time window of audiovisual integration in focused attention tasks: illustrated by studies on effect of age and prior knowledge.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of ageing on multisensory integration for the control of movement timing.

Authors:  Mark T Elliott; Alan M Wing; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Amanda H Turner; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Multisensory oddity detection as bayesian inference.

Authors:  Timothy Hospedales; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Limited interaction between translation and visual motion aftereffects in humans.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Lip-reading aids word recognition most in moderate noise: a Bayesian explanation using high-dimensional feature space.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Xiang Zhou; Lars A Ross; John J Foxe; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect before cause: supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing.

Authors:  James Heron; James V M Hanson; David Whitaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.