Literature DB >> 1437473

Coherence and transparency of moving plaids composed of Fourier and non-Fourier gratings.

J D Victor1, M M Conte.   

Abstract

We examined the perceptual coherence of two-component moving plaids. The gratings that constituted the plaids were either standard Fourier gratings (F), in which luminance was determined by a drifting sinusoid, or non-Fourier gratings (NF), in which the contrast of a random background was modulated by a drifting sinusoid. These NF gratings are examples of stimuli that generate a compelling percept of motion, even though they fail to elicit a motion signal from motion analyzers based on standard cross-correlation (Chubb & Sperling, 1988). Naive observers viewed three types of stimuli consisting of superpositions of these two components: (1) two standard drifting gratings (F/F), (2) two non-Fourier drifting gratings (NF/NF), and (3) one standard and one non-Fourier drifting grating (F/NF). As expected, the F/F stimulus yielded a compelling percept of coherent motion. The dominant percept of all the observers for the NF/NF stimulus was one of coherent motion, provided that both gratings were visible and of approximately equal contrast. None of the observers reported a dominant percept of coherent motion for the F/NF condition, over a wide range of contrasts for the two grating components and across two varieties of NF gratings. In view of the results of Albright (1992) and Albright and Chaudhuri (1989), that show that single cells in macaque V1 and MT respond to both F and NF motion, one cannot interpret our findings as evidence that F and NF motion are processed independently. Alternative, "higher level" interpretations based on the intrinsically ambiguous nature of the stimuli and physical laws governing the appearance of transparent objects are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1437473     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  21 in total

1.  Evoked potential and psychophysical analysis of Fourier and non-Fourier motion mechanisms.

Authors:  J D Victor; M M Conte
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Motion coherency rules are form-cue invariant.

Authors:  G R Stoner; T D Albright
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns.

Authors:  V P Ferrera; H R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion in monkey and man.

Authors:  R M Siegel; R A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Model for the extraction of image flow.

Authors:  D J Heeger
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception.

Authors:  C Chubb; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J A Movshon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels.

Authors:  M A Georgeson; G D Sullivan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimal inference explains the perceptual coherence of visual motion stimuli.

Authors:  James H Hedges; Alan A Stocker; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.