| Literature DB >> 21599969 |
Pi-Che Chen1, Ming-Hsuan Tsai, Sidney K H Yip, Yeong-Chin Jou, Chi-Fai Ng, Yanning Chen, Xiaoling Wang, Wei Huang, Chun-Liang Tung, Gary C W Chen, Martin M S Huang, Joanna H M Tong, Eing-Ju Song, De-Ching Chang, Cheng-Da Hsu, Ka-Fai To, Cheng-Huang Shen, Michael W Y Chan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the world and the incidence is particularly high in southwestern Taiwan. Previous studies have identified several tumor-related genes that are hypermethylated in bladder cancer; however the DNA methylation profile of bladder cancer in Taiwan is not fully understood.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21599969 PMCID: PMC3127971 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-45
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genomics ISSN: 1755-8794 Impact factor: 3.063
Summary of clinical-pathological data of tumor samples
| Taiwan | Hong Kong | China | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 70.5 | 73 | 64.5 |
| Range | 40 - 92 | 46 - 92 | 43 - 80 |
| Male | 84 | 60 | 23 |
| Female | 20 | 22 | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 34 | 16 | 8 |
| Grade 2 | 42 | 41 | 12 |
| Grade 3 | 28 | 25 | 4 |
| Stage Ta | 41 | 38 | 8 |
| Stage T1 | 41 | 21 | 6 |
| Stage ≥ T2 | 22 | 23 | 10 |
| Primary | 66 | 23 | ND |
| Recurrence | 38 | 58 | ND |
ND: data not available
Summary of clinical-pathological data of urine samples from tumor patients and normal control in Taiwan
| Cancer | Normal | |
|---|---|---|
| Median | 71.5 | 62 |
| Range | 47 - 92 | 39 - 85 |
| Male | 25 | 11 |
| Female | 5 | 8 |
| Grade 1 | 12 | |
| Grade 2 | 13 | |
| Grade 3 | 5 | |
| Stage Ta | 13 | |
| Stage T1 | 12 | |
| Stage ≥ T2 | 4 | |
| Primary | 26 | |
| Recurrence | 4 |
*Staging information of one cancer patient is not available
Figure 1Methylation analysis of . A. Representative gel electrophoresis images of the MSP result from Taiwan bladder cancer samples TW262 and TW20. M indicates the presence of methylated genes; U indicates the presence of unmethylated genes. IVD (in vitro methylated DNA) was used as the positive control for methylation; Normal blood (NB) genomic DNA was used as the positive control for unmethylation; B. Frequency of methylation of different genes in tumor tissues from 104 Taiwan bladder cancer patients.
Figure 2DNA Methylation profiles from different Chinese sub-populations. A. The histogram showed that methylation of p14, IRF8, APC, hMLH1, SOCS-1 and E-cadherin varied among different Chinese sub-populations. * and ** denote P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 respectively (Mann-Whitney U). B, Histogram showing the number of patients against the number of genes methylated concurrently. Samples from Taiwan and China displayed bimodal distribution which is a characteristic of CpG island methylator phentotype (CIMP). C. Dichotomous heat map of the DNA methylation data from different Chinese sub-populations. Black, orange and blue blocks represented methylated loci from Taiwan, Hong Kong and China respectively. Red bars indicated MI-high populations (≥5 genes showing concurrent methylation) and green bars indicated MI-low populations.
Figure 3Association between gene methylation and tumor progression of bladder cancer in different Chinese sub-populations. The histogram demonstrated the association between (A) methylation index, MI or (B) methylation of individual gene with tumor progression in terms of tumor grade, stage and relapse in bladder cancer samples from Taiwan, Hong Kong (HK) and China. Low grade represented grade 1 cases; high grade represented ≥ grade 2 cases. Low stage represented stage < T2 cases; high stage represented ≥ T2 cases. * and **, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 respectively.
Correlations between methylation index and clinical-pathological data in Taiwan samples
| MI - Low | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | |||
| 70.4 ± 12.7 | 68.4 ± 11.8 | ||
| No. of cases | |||
| Male | 36 | 48 | 0.295 |
| Female | 6 | 14 | |
| Grade 1 | 5 | 29 | |
| Grade 2 | 16 | 26 | <0.001 |
| Grade 3 | 21 | 7 | |
| Stage Ta | 9 | 32 | |
| Stage T1 | 17 | 24 | <0.001 |
| Stage ≥ T2 | 16 | 6 | |
| Primary | 24 | 42 | 0.273 |
| Recurrence | 18 | 20 | |
1 Cases grouped into MI-High if methylation index ≥ 5; otherwise, grouped into MI-Low
Correlation between RASSF1A methylation and cancer recurrence in Taiwan samples
| Methylated | unmethylated | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary (n = 66) | 17 (25.7%)1 | 49 (74.2%) | |
| Recurrence (n = 38) | 17 (44.7%) | 21 (55.2%) | 0.039 |
1Values are number of cases (%)
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier analysis of . Patients were grouped according to methylation of (A) APC or (B) RASSF1A as determined by MSP. Patients with methylation of APC or RASSF1A have a significant shorter time of RFS. P-values from Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test are shown.
Figure 5Quantification of . Values in dot plot represented methylation percentage relative to the IVD (100%). The horizontal line represented median value. ** denotes P < 0.01 (Mann-Whitney U).
Sensitivity and specificity of cancer detection using voided urine samples from Taiwan
| | 26.7 | 56.7 | 27.6 | 30.0 | 41.4 | 86.7 |
| | 25.0 | 50.0 | 41.7 | 16.7 | 50.0 | 91.7 |
| | 27.7 | 61.1 | 16.7 | 38.9 | 33.4 | 83.3 |
| | 30.8 | 61.5 | 30.8 | 30.8 | 34.6 | 84.6 |
| | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 75 | 100 |
| 89.5 | 94.7 | 100 | 89.5 | 100 | 94.7 |
1 Any one of these genes (IRF8, p14 and sFRP1) showed methylation in urine samples.