Literature DB >> 19181545

Increase sensitivity in detecting superficial, low grade bladder cancer by combination analysis of hypermethylation of E-cadherin, p16, p14, RASSF1A genes in urine.

Hui-Hui Lin1, Hung-Lung Ke, Shu-Pin Huang, Wen-Jeng Wu, Yu-Kuei Chen, Lin-Li Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify a better set of DNA methylation markers to detect superficial, low grade cancer cell in urine sediment for improving cancer treatment, morbidity, and mortality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) assay was used to detect promoter hypermethylation in 4 genes (E-cadherin, p16, p14, and RASSF1A) to identify reliable biomarkers for bladder cancer diagnosis in primary tumor DNA and urine sediment DNA from 57 bladder cancer patients. Urine DNA was compared with 20 healthy controls.
RESULTS: Fifty-one (90%) tumor DNA and 47 urine DNA (83%) samples from bladder cancer patients revealed hypermethylation in at least 1 of the 4 analyzed genes, whereas all urine samples from normal controls were negative. The sensitivity of MSP assay for detecting E-cadherin, p16, p14 and RASSF1A in tumor cells in voided urine was 35%, 35%, 33%, and 65%, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity was 75% for combining RASSF1A and p14, and 83% for RASSF1A, p14 and E-cadherin. Urine cytology, however, detect only 13 (28%) cases of cancer or suspicious cancer. For detecting superficial and invasive bladder tumor, urine cytology revealed a sensitivity of 23% (6/26) and 35% (7/20), respectively. In contrast, MSP detected hypermethylation in the urine of 80% (37/46) bladder cancer patients. Moreover, hypermethylation analysis of E-cadherin, p14 or RASSF1A genes in urine sediment DNA detected in 85% (22/26) of superficial, 85% (11/13) of low grade, 75% (15/20) of invasive and 79% (26/33) of high grade bladder cancers. Importantly, hypermethylation was detected in the urine DNA of 90% (18/20) superficial tumors with negative or atypia cytology.
CONCLUSIONS: Hypermethylation of E-cadherin, p14 or RASSF1A in urine sediment DNA is a potential biomarker for detecting superficial, low grade cancer. Besides, hypermethylation of these 3 genes is a valuable adjunct diagnostic marker to urine cytology, which can enhance the diagnostic accuracy and follow-up treatment of bladder cancer patients.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19181545     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  30 in total

Review 1.  Promoter hypermethylation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jong Y Park
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.302

2.  Hypermethylation in bladder cancer: biological pathways and translational applications.

Authors:  Marta Sánchez-Carbayo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-01-25

3.  Urine cytology and adjunct markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peggy S Sullivan; Jessica B Chan; Mary R Levin; Jianyu Rao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Spectrum of genetic mutations in de novo PUNLMP of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena; Aline C Tregnago; Marie-Lisa Eich; Simeon Springer; Yuxuan Wang; Diana Taheri; Dilek Ertoy; Kazutoshi Fujita; Stephania M Bezerra; Isabela W Cunha; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Lijia Yu; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; George J Netto
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  DNA methylation-based biomarkers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Raju Kandimalla; Angela A van Tilborg; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Molecular biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: are we there yet?

Authors:  George J Netto
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Emerging critical role of molecular testing in diagnostic genitourinary pathology.

Authors:  George J Netto; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 8.  DNA Methylation and Urological Cancer, a Step Towards Personalized Medicine: Current and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Jose I López; Santiago Ropero
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.074

9.  The relationship between promoter methylation of p16 gene and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Defeng Qi; Jinhui Li; Mei Jiang; Chenli Liu; Yuan Hu; Mengxi Li; Jialin Su; Biao Que; Weidong Ji
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 10.  Potential new urinary markers in the early detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Samir P Shirodkar; Vinata B Lokeshwar
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.