Literature DB >> 16849682

Quantitation of promoter methylation of multiple genes in urine DNA and bladder cancer detection.

Mohammad Obaidul Hoque1, Shahnaz Begum, Ozlem Topaloglu, Aditi Chatterjee, Eli Rosenbaum, Wim Van Criekinge, William H Westra, Mark Schoenberg, Marianna Zahurak, Steven N Goodman, David Sidransky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The noninvasive identification of bladder tumors may improve disease control and prevent disease progression. Aberrant promoter methylation (i.e., hypermethylation) is a major mechanism for silencing tumor suppressor genes and other cancer-associated genes in many human cancers, including bladder cancer.
METHODS: A quantitative fluorogenic real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to examine primary tumor DNA and urine sediment DNA from 15 patients with bladder cancer and 25 control subjects for promoter hypermethylation of nine genes (APC, ARF, CDH1, GSTP1, MGMT, CDKN2A, RARbeta2, RASSF1A, and TIMP3) to identify potential biomarkers for bladder cancer. We then used these markers to examine urine sediment DNA samples from an additional 160 patients with bladder cancers of various stages and grades and from an additional 69 age-matched control subjects. Data were analyzed on the basis of a prediction model and were internally validated using a jacknife procedure. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: For all 15 patients with paired DNA samples, the promoter methylation pattern in urine matched that in the primary tumors. Four genes displayed 100% specificity. Of the 175 bladder cancer patients, 121 (69%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 62% to 76%) displayed promoter methylation in at least one of these genes (CDKN2A, ARF, MGMT, and GSTP1), whereas all control subjects were negative for such methylation (100% specificity, 95% CI = 96% to 100%). A logistic prediction model using the methylation levels of all remaining five genes was developed and internally validated for subjects who were negative on the four-gene panel. This combined, two-stage predictor produced an internally validated ROC curve with an overall sensitivity of 82% (95% CI = 75 % to 87%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI = 90% to 99%).
CONCLUSION: Testing a small panel of genes with the quantitative methylation-specific PCR assay in urine sediment DNA is a powerful noninvasive approach for the detection of bladder cancer. Larger independent confirmatory cohorts with longitudinal follow-up will be required in future studies to define the impact of this technology on early detection, prognosis, and disease monitoring before clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16849682     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  97 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetics of kidney cancer and bladder cancer.

Authors:  Amanda M Hoffman; Paul Cairns
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.778

2.  Custom-designed MLPA using multiple short synthetic probes: application to methylation analysis of five promoter CpG islands in tumor and urine specimens from patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Reza R Serizawa; Ulrik Ralfkiaer; Christina Dahl; Gitte W Lam; Alastair B Hansen; Kenneth Steven; Thomas Horn; Per Guldberg
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Translational genomics: the challenge of developing cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  James D Brooks
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Global histone post-translational modifications and cancer: Biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment?

Authors:  Shafqat Ali Khan; Divya Reddy; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-11-26

5.  Hypermethylation in bladder cancer: biological pathways and translational applications.

Authors:  Marta Sánchez-Carbayo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-01-25

6.  Aberrant vimentin methylation is characteristic of upper gastrointestinal pathologies.

Authors:  Helen Moinova; Rom S Leidner; Lakshmeswari Ravi; James Lutterbaugh; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Yanwen Chen; Amitabh Chak; Sanford D Markowitz; Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Quick recovery and characterization of cell-free DNA in seminal plasma of normozoospermia and azoospermia: implications for non-invasive genetic utilities.

Authors:  Hong-Gang Li; Shi-Yun Huang; Hui Zhou; Ai-Hua Liao; Cheng-Liang Xiong
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Hypermethylated SFRP1, but none of other nine genes "informative" for western countries, is valuable for bladder cancer detection in Mainland China.

Authors:  Jinfeng Sun; Zhou Chen; Tongyu Zhu; Jian Yu; Kelong Ma; Hongyu Zhang; Yinghua He; Xiaoying Luo; Jingde Zhu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Genome-wide methylation profiling and the PI3K-AKT pathway analysis associated with smoking in urothelial cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mariana Brait; Enrico Munari; Cynthia LeBron; Maartje G Noordhuis; Shahnaz Begum; Christina Michailidi; Nilda Gonzalez-Roibon; Leonel Maldonado; Tanusree Sen; Rafael Guerrero-Preston; Leslie Cope; Paola Parrella; Vito Michele Fazio; Patrick K Ha; George J Netto; David Sidransky; Mohammad O Hoque
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Quantitative methylation profiles for multiple tumor suppressor gene promoters in salivary gland tumors.

Authors:  Megan L Durr; Wojciech K Mydlarz; Chunbo Shao; Marianna L Zahurak; Alice Y Chuang; Mohammad O Hoque; William H Westra; Nanette J Liegeois; Joseph A Califano; David Sidransky; Patrick K Ha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.