Literature DB >> 12560776

How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?

Tarek A Emam1, Alfred Cuschieri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of ultrasonic dissection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: High-power ultrasonic dissection is in widespread use for both open and laparoscopic operations and is generally perceived to carry a low risk of collateral damage, but there is no published evidence for this.
METHODS: Under controlled experimental conditions, ultrasonic dissections were performed in pigs using Ultracision (Ethicon) or Autosonix (Tyco/USSC) at the three power settings (3, 4, and 5) in random fashion to mobilize the cardia and fundus, bile duct, hepatic artery, portal vein, aorta from the inferior vena cava, renal vessels, colon, and ureters. The dissections (open and laparoscopic) were carried out on pigs at each power setting with each device. Thermal mapping of the tissues during dissection was performed with an infrared thermal camera and associated software. The animals were killed at the end of each experiment and specimens were harvested for quantitative histology.
RESULTS: Extreme and equivalent temperature gradients were generated by ultrasonic dissection with both systems. Heat production was directly proportional to the power setting and the activation time. The core body temperature of the animals after completion of the laparoscopic dissections rose by an average of 2.3 degrees C. The zone around the jaws that exceeded 60 degrees C with continuous ultrasonic dissection for 10 to 15 seconds at level 5 measured 25.3 and 25.7 mm for Ultracision and Autosonix, respectively. At this power setting and an activation time of 15 seconds, the temperature 1.0 cm away from the tips of the instrument exceeded 140 degrees C. Although there was no discernible macroscopic damage, these thermal changes were accompanied by significant histologic injury that extended to the media of large vessels and caused partial- to full-thickness mural damage of the cardia, ureter, and bile duct. Collateral damage was absent or insignificant after dissections at power level 3 with both systems and an activation time not exceeding 5 seconds.
CONCLUSIONS: High-power ultrasonic dissections at level 5 and to a lesser extent level 4 result in considerable heat production that causes proximity collateral damage to adjacent tissues when the continuous activation time exceeds 10 seconds. Ultrasonic dissections near important structures should be conducted at level 3. At power levels of 4 and 5, the ultrasonic energy bursts to the tissue should not exceed 5 seconds at any one time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12560776      PMCID: PMC1522135          DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048454.11276.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  6 in total

1.  Experimental study on heat production by a 23.5-kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  T Kinoshita; E Kanehira; K Omura; K Kawakami; Y Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Recent advances in high-frequency electrosurgery: development of automated systems.

Authors:  R Haag; A Cuschieri
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1993-12

3.  Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery in a closed gaseous environment. An in vitro study.

Authors:  C Hensman; D Baty; R G Willis; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Proximity injury by the ultrasonically activated scalpel during dissection.

Authors:  K M Kadesky; B Schopf; J F Magee; G K Blair
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Medicotechnical basics of surgery using invasive ultrasonic energy.

Authors:  W Mueller; G Fritzsch
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1994 Jun-Aug

6.  Wound healing of skin incisions produced by ultrasonically vibrating knife, scalpel, electrosurgery, and carbon dioxide laser.

Authors:  R Hambley; P A Hebda; E Abell; B A Cohen; B V Jegasothy
Journal:  J Dermatol Surg Oncol       Date:  1988-11
  6 in total
  64 in total

1.  Synthetic polymer-tissue adhesion using an ultrasonic scalpel.

Authors:  Kenji Yamamoto; Tsuyoshi Kimura; Kwangwoo Nam; Seiichi Funamoto; Yukiko Ito; Kumiko Shiba; Ayako Katoh; Shigeru Shimizu; Kimio Kurita; Tetsuya Higami; Toru Masuzawa; Akio Kishida
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Heat production, nerve function, and morphology following nerve close dissection with surgical instruments.

Authors:  Johan Carlander; C Koch; L Brudin; C Nordborg; O Gimm; K Johansson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Thermal fusion: effects and interactions of temperature, compression, and duration variables.

Authors:  Deogracias A G Reyes; Stuart I Brown; Lynda Cochrane; Luisa S Motta; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Surgical Efficacy Among Laparoscopic Ultrasonic Dissectors: Are We Advancing Safely? A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Rajesh Devassy; Sreelatha Gopalakrishnan; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-09-14

5.  Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure.

Authors:  Theodore Diamantis; Michael Kontos; Antonios Arvelakis; Spiridon Syroukis; Dimitris Koronarchis; Apostolos Papalois; Emmanuel Agapitos; Elias Bastounis; Andreas C Lazaris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Temperature safety profile of laparoscopic devices: Harmonic ACE (ACE), Ligasure V (LV), and plasma trisector (PT).

Authors:  F J Kim; M F Chammas; E Gewehr; M Morihisa; F Caldas; E Hayacibara; M Baptistussi; F Meyer; A C Martins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  [Ultrasonic scissors. New vs resterilized instruments].

Authors:  D Gärtner; K Münz; E Hückelheim; U Hesse
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Thermal injury secondary to laparoscopic fiber-optic cables.

Authors:  A Katharine Hindle; Fred Brody; Vernon Hopkins; Greg Rosales; Florencia Gonzalez; Arnold Schwartz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Thermal spread and heat absorbance differences between open and laparoscopic surgeries during energized dissections by electrosurgical instruments.

Authors:  C Song; B Tang; P A Campbell; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Elliot Yung; Michel Gagner; Alfons Pomp; Gregory Dakin; Luca Milone; Gladys Strain
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.