PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a practical method for the quantification of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on coronary MR angiograms (MRA) acquired with parallel imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To quantify the spatially varying noise due to parallel imaging reconstruction, a new method has been implemented incorporating image data acquisition followed by a fast noise scan during which radiofrequency pulses, cardiac triggering and navigator gating are disabled. The performance of this method was evaluated in a phantom study where SNR measurements were compared with those of a reference standard (multiple repetitions). Subsequently, SNR of myocardium and posterior skeletal muscle was determined on in vivo human coronary MRA. RESULTS: In a phantom, the SNR measured using the proposed method deviated less than 10.1% from the reference method for small geometry factors (≤2). In vivo, the noise scan for a 10 min coronary MRA acquisition was acquired in 30 s. Higher signal and lower SNR, due to spatially varying noise, were found in myocardium compared with posterior skeletal muscle. CONCLUSION: SNR quantification based on a fast noise scan is a validated and easy-to-use method when applied to three-dimensional coronary MRA obtained with parallel imaging as long as the geometry factor remains low.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a practical method for the quantification of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on coronary MR angiograms (MRA) acquired with parallel imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To quantify the spatially varying noise due to parallel imaging reconstruction, a new method has been implemented incorporating image data acquisition followed by a fast noise scan during which radiofrequency pulses, cardiac triggering and navigator gating are disabled. The performance of this method was evaluated in a phantom study where SNR measurements were compared with those of a reference standard (multiple repetitions). Subsequently, SNR of myocardium and posterior skeletal muscle was determined on in vivo human coronary MRA. RESULTS: In a phantom, the SNR measured using the proposed method deviated less than 10.1% from the reference method for small geometry factors (≤2). In vivo, the noise scan for a 10 min coronary MRA acquisition was acquired in 30 s. Higher signal and lower SNR, due to spatially varying noise, were found in myocardium compared with posterior skeletal muscle. CONCLUSION: SNR quantification based on a fast noise scan is a validated and easy-to-use method when applied to three-dimensional coronary MRA obtained with parallel imaging as long as the geometry factor remains low.
Authors: M Stuber; R M Botnar; P G Danias; D K Sodickson; K V Kissinger; M Van Cauteren; J De Becker; W J Manning Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Alex Etienne; René M Botnar; Arianne M C Van Muiswinkel; Peter Boesiger; Warren J Manning; Matthias Stuber Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Garry E Gold; Eric Han; Jeff Stainsby; Graham Wright; Jean Brittain; Christopher Beaulieu Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Kevin R Johnson; Salil J Patel; Amy Whigham; Alex Hakim; Roderic I Pettigrew; John N Oshinski Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2004 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Matthias Stuber; René M Botnar; Stefan E Fischer; Rolf Lamerichs; Jouke Smink; Paul Harvey; Warren J Manning Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Donnie Cameron; Mustapha Bouhrara; David A Reiter; Kenneth W Fishbein; Seongjin Choi; Christopher M Bergeron; Luigi Ferrucci; Richard G Spencer Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Fatemeh Adelnia; Michelle Shardell; Christopher M Bergeron; Kenneth W Fishbein; Richard G Spencer; Luigi Ferrucci; David A Reiter Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Elizabeth R Jenista; Wolfgang G Rehwald; Enn-Ling Chen; Han W Kim; Igor Klem; Michele A Parker; Raymond J Kim Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sahar Soleimanifard; Michael Schär; Allison G Hays; Jerry L Prince; Robert G Weiss; Matthias Stuber Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jiacheng Zhang; Sean M Rothenberger; Melissa C Brindise; Michael B Scott; Haben Berhane; Justin J Baraboo; Michael Markl; Vitaliy L Rayz; Pavlos P Vlachos Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 10.048