Literature DB >> 21574648

Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Helen M Moore1, Andrea B Kelly, Scott D Jewell, Lisa M McShane, Douglas P Clark, Renata Greenspan, Daniel F Hayes, Pierre Hainaut, Paula Kim, Elizabeth Mansfield, Olga Potapova, Peter Riegman, Yaffa Rubinstein, Edward Seijo, Stella Somiari, Peter Watson, Heinz-Ulrich Weier, Claire Zhu, Jim Vaught.   

Abstract

Human biospecimens are subject to a number of different collection, processing, and storage factors that can significantly alter their molecular composition and consistency. These biospecimen preanalytical factors, in turn, influence experimental outcomes and the ability to reproduce scientific results. Currently, the extent and type of information specific to the biospecimen preanalytical conditions reported in scientific publications and regulatory submissions varies widely. To improve the quality of research utilizing human tissues, it is critical that information regarding the handling of biospecimens be reported in a thorough, accurate, and standardized manner. The Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ) recommendations outlined herein are intended to apply to any study in which human biospecimens are used. The purpose of reporting these details is to supply others, from researchers to regulators, with more consistent and standardized information to better evaluate, interpret, compare, and reproduce the experimental results. The BRISQ guidelines are proposed as an important and timely resource tool to strengthen communication and publications around biospecimen-related research and help reassure patient contributors and the advocacy community that the contributions are valued and respected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21574648      PMCID: PMC3169291          DOI: 10.1021/pr200021n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  85 in total

1.  Plastic versus glass tubes: effects on analytical performance of selected serum and plasma hormone assays.

Authors:  Carol M Preissner; William M Reilly; Richard C Cyr; Dennis J O'Kane; Ravinder J Singh; Stefan K G Grebe
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Impact of pre-analytical handling on bone marrow mRNA gene expression.

Authors:  Stephen Breit; Matthias Nees; Ulrike Schaefer; Margit Pfoersich; Christian Hagemeier; Martina Muckenthaler; Andreas E Kulozik
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Analytical and preanalytical biases in serum proteomic pattern analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Aly Karsan; Bernhard J Eigl; Stephane Flibotte; Karen Gelmon; Philip Switzer; Patricia Hassell; Dorothy Harrison; Jennifer Law; Malcolm Hayes; Moira Stillwell; Zhen Xiao; Thomas P Conrads; Timothy Veenstra
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Successful application of microarray technology to microdissected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Authors:  Renata A Coudry; Sibele I Meireles; Radka Stoyanova; Harry S Cooper; Alan Carpino; Xianqun Wang; Paul F Engstrom; Margie L Clapper
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Proteomic analysis and comparison of the biopsy and autopsy specimen of human brain temporal lobe.

Authors:  Sizhi He; Qingsong Wang; Jintang He; Hai Pu; Wei Yang; Jianguo Ji
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Boudewijn J M Braakhuis; Maarten P Tabor; J Alain Kummer; C René Leemans; Ruud H Brakenhoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Effects of specimen collection, processing, and storage conditions on stability of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA levels in plasma.

Authors:  C C Ginocchio; X P Wang; M H Kaplan; G Mulligan; D Witt; J W Romano; M Cronin; R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Preliminary comparison of quantity, quality, and microarray performance of RNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, and unfixed frozen tissue samples.

Authors:  Marshall S Scicchitano; Deidre A Dalmas; Melissa A Bertiaux; Shawn M Anderson; Leah R Turner; Roberta A Thomas; Rossana Mirable; Rogely W Boyce
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  2009 Biospecimen research network symposium: advancing cancer research through biospecimen science.

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Carolyn C Compton; Mark D Lim; Jimmie Vaught; Katerina N Christiansen; Joe Alper
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  An exfoliation and enrichment strategy results in improved transcriptional profiles when compared to matched formalin fixed samples.

Authors:  Wilfrido D Mojica; Leighton Stein; Lesleyann Hawthorn
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-08-03
View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  Cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  [Maintainance of a research tissue bank. (Infra)structural and quality aspects].

Authors:  S Schmitt; K Kynast; P Schirmacher; E Herpel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Statistical and practical considerations for clinical evaluation of predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn; Barbara A Conley; Jeffrey S Abrams; Lisa M McShane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Transforming growth factor-β2 is sequestered in preterm human milk by chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans.

Authors:  Kopperuncholan Namachivayam; Hayley P Coffing; Nehru Viji Sankaranarayanan; Yingzi Jin; Krishnan MohanKumar; Brandy L Frost; Cynthia L Blanco; Aloka L Patel; Paula P Meier; Steven A Garzon; Umesh R Desai; Akhil Maheshwari
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  The Challenges of Validating in Precision Medicine: The Case of Excision Repair Cross-Complement Group 1 Diagnostic Testing.

Authors:  Brianna Barsanti-Innes; Spencer Phillips Hey; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 6.  New paradigms in translational science research in cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Paul D Wagner; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 7.  Biobanking for research in surgery: are surgeons in charge for advancing translational research or mere assistants in biomaterial and data preservation?

Authors:  Wolfgang E Thasler; Reinhard M K Thasler; Celine Schelcher; Karl-Walter Jauch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Moving toward biospecimen harmonization with evidence-based practices.

Authors:  Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  A critical analysis of cancer biobank practices in relation to biospecimen quality.

Authors:  Amanda Rush; Kevin Spring; Jennifer A Byrne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2015-10-22

Review 10.  Publication of tumor marker research results: the necessity for complete and transparent reporting.

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.