Literature DB >> 12702551

A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications.

Boudewijn J M Braakhuis1, Maarten P Tabor, J Alain Kummer, C René Leemans, Ruud H Brakenhoff.   

Abstract

The concept of "field cancerization" was first introduced by Slaughter et al. [D. P, Slaughter et al., Cancer (Phila.), 6: 963-968, 1953] in 1953 when studying the presence of histologically abnormal tissue surrounding oral squamous cell carcinoma. It was proposed to explain the development of multiple primary tumors and locally recurrent cancer. Organ systems in which field cancerization has been described since then are: head and neck (oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx), lung, vulva, esophagus, cervix, breast, skin, colon, and bladder. Recent molecular findings support the carcinogenesis model in which the development of a field with genetically altered cells plays a central role. In the initial phase, a stem cell acquires genetic alterations and forms a "patch," a clonal unit of altered daughter cells. These patches can be recognized on the basis of mutations in TP53, and have been reported for head and neck, lung, skin, and breast cancer. The conversion of a patch into an expanding field is the next logical and critical step in epithelial carcinogenesis. Additional genetic alterations are required for this step, and by virtue of its growth advantage, a proliferating field gradually displaces the normal mucosa. In the mucosa of the head and neck, as well as the esophagus, such fields have been detected with dimensions of >7 cm in diameter, whereas they are usually not detected by routine diagnostic techniques. Ultimately, clonal divergence leads to the development of one or more tumors within a contiguous field of preneoplastic cells. An important clinical implication is that fields often remain after surgery of the primary tumor and may lead to new cancers, designated presently by clinicians as "a second primary tumor" or "local recurrence," depending on the exact site and time interval. In conclusion, the development of an expanding preneoplastic field appears to be a critical step in epithelial carcinogenesis with important clinical consequences. Diagnosis and treatment of epithelial cancers should not only be focused on the tumor but also on the field from which it developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12702551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  322 in total

1.  Telomere length variation in normal epithelial cells adjacent to tumor: potential biomarker for breast cancer local recurrence.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Alan K Meeker; Kepher H Makambi; Ourania Kosti; Bhaskar V S Kallakury; Mary K Sidawy; Christopher A Loffredo; Yun-Ling Zheng
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Genome-wide expression and copy number analysis identifies driver genes in gingivobuccal cancers.

Authors:  Srikant Ambatipudi; Moritz Gerstung; Manishkumar Pandey; Tanuja Samant; Asawari Patil; Shubhada Kane; Rajiv S Desai; Alejandro A Schäffer; Niko Beerenwinkel; Manoj B Mahimkar
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Light-scattering technologies for field carcinogenesis detection: a modality for endoscopic prescreening.

Authors:  Vadim Backman; Hemant K Roy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  How do persistent infections with hepatitis C virus cause liver cancer?

Authors:  Jonathan K Mitchell; Stanley M Lemon; David R McGivern
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  The adjacent to tumor sample trap.

Authors:  Paulo Pimentel de Assumpção; Sidney Emanuel Batista Dos Santos; Ândrea Kely Campos Ribeiro Dos Santos; Samia Demachki; André Salim Khayat; Geraldo Ishak; Danielle Queiroz Calcagno; Ney Pereira Carneiro Dos Santos; Carolina Baraúna de Assumpção; Mônica Baraúna de Assumpção; Vinicius Albuquerque Sortica; Taíssa Maíra Thomaz Araújo; Fabiano Cordeiro Moreira; André Maurício Ribeiro Dos Santos; Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Procedures for risk-stratification of lung cancer using buccal nanocytology.

Authors:  H Subramanian; P Viswanathan; L Cherkezyan; R Iyengar; S Rozhok; M Verleye; J Derbas; J Czarnecki; H K Roy; V Backman
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Clonal expansions and short telomeres are associated with neoplasia in early-onset, but not late-onset, ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Jesse J Salk; Aasthaa Bansal; Lisa A Lai; David A Crispin; Cigdem H Ussakli; Marshall S Horwitz; Mary P Bronner; Teresa A Brentnall; Lawrence A Loeb; Peter S Rabinovitch; Rosa Ana Risques
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 9.  Novel biomarkers of fibrosis in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Pierlorenzo Pallante; Francesco Selvaggi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Chromosomal aneusomy in bronchial high-grade lesions is associated with invasive lung cancer.

Authors:  Steinn Jonsson; Marileila Varella-Garcia; York E Miller; Holly J Wolf; Tim Byers; Sarah Braudrick; Porntip Kiatsimkul; Marina Lewis; Timothy C Kennedy; Robert L Keith; Johannes Bjornsson; Annette McWilliams; Stephen Lam; Fred R Hirsch; Wilbur A Franklin
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.