Literature DB >> 19706749

2009 Biospecimen research network symposium: advancing cancer research through biospecimen science.

Helen M Moore1, Carolyn C Compton, Mark D Lim, Jimmie Vaught, Katerina N Christiansen, Joe Alper.   

Abstract

This report details the proceedings of the 2009 Biospecimen Research Network (BRN) Symposium that took place on March 16 to 18, 2009, the second in a series of annual symposia sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research. The BRN Symposium is a public forum addressing the relevance of biospecimen quality to progress in cancer research and the systematic investigation needed to understand how different methods of collection, processing, and storage of human biospecimens affect subsequent molecular research results. More than 300 participants from industry, academia, and government attended the symposium, which featured both formal presentations and a day of workshops aimed at addressing several key issues in biospecimen science. An additional 100 individuals participated via a live webcast (archived at http://brnsymposium.com). The BRN Symposium is part of a larger program designed as a networked, multidisciplinary research approach to increase the knowledge base for biospecimen science. Biospecimens are generally understood to represent an accurate representation of a patient's disease biology, but can instead reflect a combination of disease biology and the biospecimen's response to a wide range of biological stresses. The molecular signatures of disease can thus be confounded by the signatures of biospecimen biological stress, with the potential to affect clinical and research outcomes through incorrect diagnosis of disease, improper use of a given therapy, and irreproducible research results that can lead to misinterpretation of artifacts as biomarkers. Biospecimen research represents the kind of bricks-and-mortar research that provides a solid scientific foundation for future advances that will directly help patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19706749      PMCID: PMC2782665          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  35 in total

1.  Immunological fingerprinting method for differentiation of serum samples in research-oriented biobanks.

Authors:  Katy Beaumont; Fotini Betsou
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-02-17

2.  Quality management and accreditation of research tissue banks: experience of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg.

Authors:  Esther Herpel; Christoph Röcken; Heike Manke; Peter Schirmacher; Christa Flechtenmacher
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Image-Guided Biopsy in the Era of Personalized Cancer Care: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Research Consensus Panel.

Authors:  Alda L Tam; Howard J Lim; Ignacio I Wistuba; Anobel Tamrazi; Michael D Kuo; Etay Ziv; Stephen Wong; Albert J Shih; Robert J Webster; Gregory S Fischer; Sunitha Nagrath; Suzanne E Davis; Sarah B White; Kamran Ahrar
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Bring on the biomarkers.

Authors:  George Poste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Predictors of biospecimen donation in the Black Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Chiranjeev Dash; Julie R Palmer; Manuela V Wiedemeier; Cordelia W Russell; Lynn Rosenberg; Yvette C Cozier
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  A primer on a hepatocellular carcinoma bioresource bank using the cancer genome atlas guidelines: practical issues and pitfalls.

Authors:  N Thao T Nguyen; Ron T Cotton; Theresa R Harring; Jacfranz J Guiteau; Marie-Claude Gingras; David A Wheeler; Christine A O'Mahony; Richard A Gibbs; F Charles Brunicardi; John A Goss
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Lung and Abdominal Biopsies in the Age of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Leonard Dalag; Jonathan K Fergus; Steven M Zangan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 8.  Biobanking in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jane H Zhou; Aysegul A Sahin; Jeffrey N Myers
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 9.  Identification of evidence-based biospecimen quality-control tools: a report of the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Biospecimen Science Working Group.

Authors:  Fotini Betsou; Elaine Gunter; Judith Clements; Yvonne DeSouza; Katrina A B Goddard; Fiorella Guadagni; Wusheng Yan; Amy Skubitz; Stella Somiari; Trina Yeadon; Rodrigo Chuaqui
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 10.  The role of the pathologist in tissue banking: European Consensus Expert Group Report.

Authors:  Generoso Bevilacqua; Fred Bosman; Thibaut Dassesse; Heinz Höfler; Anne Janin; Rupert Langer; Denis Larsimont; Manuel M Morente; Peter Riegman; Peter Schirmacher; Giorgio Stanta; Kurt Zatloukal; Elodie Caboux; Pierre Hainaut
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.