Literature DB >> 22424436

New paradigms in translational science research in cancer biomarkers.

Paul D Wagner1, Sudhir Srivastava.   

Abstract

Despite significant investments in basic science by the US National Institutes of Health, there is a concern that the return on this investment has been limited in terms of clinical utility. In the field of biomarkers, translational research is used to bridge the gap between the results of basic research that identify biomolecules involved in or the consequence of carcinogenesis and their incorporation into medical application. The cultural separation between different scientific disciplines often makes it difficult to establish the multidisciplinary and multi-skilled teams that are necessary for successful translational research. The field of biomarker research requires extensive interactions between academic researchers and industrial developers, and clinicians are needed to help shape the research direction that can be addressed only by a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional approach. In this article, we provide our perspective on the relatively slow pace of cancer biomarker translation, especially those for early detection and screening. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22424436      PMCID: PMC3478674          DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2012.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Res        ISSN: 1878-1810            Impact factor:   7.012


  18 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Biomarkers for cancer risk, early detection, and prognosis: the validation conundrum.

Authors:  Dean E Brenner; Daniel P Normolle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Evaluating markers for the early detection of cancer: overview of study designs and methods.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Barnett S Kramer; Martin McIntosh; Blossom H Patterson; Yu Shyr; Steven Skates
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea B Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Daniel F Hayes; Pierre Hainaut; Paula Kim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Improving the biomarker pipeline to develop and evaluate cancer screening tests.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, and lectin-bound alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jorge A Marrero; Ziding Feng; Yinghui Wang; Mindie H Nguyen; Alex S Befeler; Lewis R Roberts; K Rajender Reddy; Denise Harnois; Josep M Llovet; Daniel Normolle; Jackie Dalhgren; David Chia; Anna S Lok; Paul D Wagner; Sudhir Srivastava; Myron Schwartz
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Sources of bias in specimens for research about molecular markers for cancer.

Authors:  David F Ransohoff; Margaret L Gourlay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Why have protein biomarkers not reached the clinic?

Authors:  Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Holly Janes; Patrick M Bossuyt; John D Potter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Review: in vivo optical spectral tissue sensing-how to go from research to routine clinical application?

Authors:  Lisanne L de Boer; Jarich W Spliethoff; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Biomarkers: hopes and challenges in the path from discovery to clinical practice.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Frangogiannis
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 3.  Current advances in T-cell-based cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; Bingnan Yin; Helen Y Wang; Rong-Fu Wang
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Plasma-Engineered Polymers for Biomarker-Based Viral Detection and Highly Multiplexed Analysis.

Authors:  Seyyed Mojtaba Mousavi; Seyyed Alireza Hashemi; Masoomeh Yari Kalashgrani; Ahmad Gholami; Navid Omidifar; Aziz Babapoor; Neralla Vijayakameswara Rao; Wei-Hung Chiang
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer biomarkers: to be or not to be? Cautionary tales from a road well travelled.

Authors:  Kim Y C Fung; Edouard Nice; Ilka Priebe; Damien Belobrajdic; Aloke Phatak; Leanne Purins; Bruce Tabor; Celine Pompeia; Trevor Lockett; Timothy E Adams; Antony Burgess; Leah Cosgrove
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  From drug discovery to biomarker-driven clinical trials in lymphoma.

Authors:  Anas Younes; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Imaging preclinical tumour models: improving translational power.

Authors:  Marion de Jong; Jeroen Essers; Wytske M van Weerden
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Immunohistochemical markers of the hypoxic response can identify malignancy in phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas and optimize the detection of tumours with VHL germline mutations.

Authors:  D J Pinato; R Ramachandran; S T K Toussi; M Vergine; N Ngo; R Sharma; T Lloyd; K Meeran; F Palazzo; N Martin; B Khoo; R Dina; T M Tan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Development and promotion in translational medicine: perspectives from 2012 sino-american symposium on clinical and translational medicine.

Authors:  Mengjia Qian; Duojiao Wu; Ena Wang; Francesco M Marincola; Wei Wang; William Rhodes; Michael Liebman; Chunxue Bai; Ching-Wan Lam; Gyorgy Marko-Varga; Thomas E Fehniger; Roland Andersson; Xiangdong Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2012-10-24

10.  Plasma osteopontin is a useful diagnostic biomarker for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Seon-Sook Han; Seung-Joon Lee; Woo Jin Kim; Dong Ryeol Ryu; Jun Yeon Won; Shinyoung Park; Myeong Ju Cheon
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2013-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.