Literature DB >> 24136891

Statistical and practical considerations for clinical evaluation of predictive biomarkers.

Mei-Yin C Polley1, Boris Freidlin, Edward L Korn, Barbara A Conley, Jeffrey S Abrams, Lisa M McShane.   

Abstract

Predictive biomarkers to guide therapy for cancer patients are a cornerstone of precision medicine. Discussed herein are considerations regarding the design and interpretation of such predictive biomarker studies. These considerations are important for both planning and interpreting prospective studies and for using specimens collected from completed randomized clinical trials. Specific issues addressed are differentiation between qualitative and quantitative predictive effects, challenges due to sample size requirements for predictive biomarker assessment, and consideration of additional factors relevant to clinical utility assessment, such as toxicity and cost of new therapies as well as costs and potential morbidities associated with routine use of biomarker-based tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136891      PMCID: PMC3888208          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  24 in total

Review 1.  Does anti-EGFR therapy improve outcome in advanced colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claire L Vale; Jayne F Tierney; David Fisher; Richard A Adams; Richard Kaplan; Timothy S Maughan; Mahesh K B Parmar; Angela M Meade
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 2.  Uses and abuses of tumor markers in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-06

3.  Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Richard M Simon; Soonmyung Paik; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Phase III clinical trials that integrate treatment and biomarker evaluation.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Zhuoxin Sun; Robert Gray; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea B Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Daniel F Hayes; Pierre Hainaut; Paula Kim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Early termination of a two-stage study to develop and validate a panel of biomarkers.

Authors:  Joseph S Koopmeiners; Rachel Isaksson Vogel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Prospective molecular marker analyses of EGFR and KRAS from a randomized, placebo-controlled study of erlotinib maintenance therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wolfram Brugger; Nadja Triller; Maria Blasinska-Morawiec; Stefan Curescu; Raimundas Sakalauskas; Georgy Moiseevich Manikhas; Julien Mazieres; Renaud Whittom; Carol Ward; Karen Mayne; Kerstin Trunzer; Federico Cappuzzo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial.

Authors:  Robert Pirker; Jose R Pereira; Aleksandra Szczesna; Joachim von Pawel; Maciej Krzakowski; Rodryg Ramlau; Ihor Vynnychenko; Keunchil Park; Chih-Teng Yu; Valentyn Ganul; Jae-Kyung Roh; Emilio Bajetta; Kenneth O'Byrne; Filippo de Marinis; Wilfried Eberhardt; Thomas Goddemeier; Michael Emig; Ulrich Gatzemeier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Role of Biomarkers in the Clinical Management of Glioblastomas: What are the Barriers and How Can We Overcome Them?

Authors:  Kerrie L McDonald; Grace Aw; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  54 in total

1.  Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R Compared With R-CHOP as Frontline Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Outcomes of the Phase III Intergroup Trial Alliance/CALGB 50303.

Authors:  Nancy L Bartlett; Wyndham H Wilson; Sin-Ho Jung; Eric D Hsi; Matthew J Maurer; Levi D Pederson; Mei-Yin C Polley; Brandelyn N Pitcher; Bruce D Cheson; Brad S Kahl; Jonathan W Friedberg; Louis M Staudt; Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Kristie A Blum; Jeremy S Abramson; Nishitha M Reddy; Jane N Winter; Julie E Chang; Ajay K Gopal; Amy Chadburn; Susan Mathew; Richard I Fisher; Kristy L Richards; Heiko Schöder; Andrew D Zelenetz; John P Leonard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  A Cancer Biologist's Primer on Machine Learning Applications in High-Dimensional Cytometry.

Authors:  Timothy J Keyes; Pablo Domizi; Yu-Chen Lo; Garry P Nolan; Kara L Davis
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: III. The 2014 Biomarker Working Group Report.

Authors:  Sophie Paczesny; Frances T Hakim; Joseph Pidala; Kenneth R Cooke; Julia Lathrop; Linda M Griffith; John Hansen; Madan Jagasia; David Miklos; Steven Pavletic; Robertson Parkman; Estelle Russek-Cohen; Mary E D Flowers; Stephanie Lee; Paul Martin; Georgia Vogelsang; Marc Walton; Kirk R Schultz
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Next-Generation Sequencing to Guide Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Lillian L Siu; Barbara A Conley; Scott Boerner; Patricia M LoRusso
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Hypoxia gene expression signatures as predictive biomarkers for personalising radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lingjian Yang; Catharine Ml West
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The Fundamental Difficulty With Evaluating the Accuracy of Biomarkers for Guiding Treatment.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe; Lisa M McShane; Daniel J Sargent; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Development of omics-based clinical tests for prognosis and therapy selection: the challenge of achieving statistical robustness and clinical utility.

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Mei-Yin C Polley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 8.  Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  The Challenge for Development of Valuable Immuno-oncology Biomarkers.

Authors:  Janice M Mehnert; Arta M Monjazeb; Johanna M T Beerthuijzen; Deborah Collyar; Larry Rubinstein; Lyndsay N Harris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  New insights on PI3K/AKT pathway alterations and clinical outcomes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sherry X Yang; Eric Polley; Stanley Lipkowitz
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 12.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.