BACKGROUND: High-quality biospecimens of human origin with annotated clinical and procedural data are an important tool for biomedical research, not only to map physiology, pathophysiology and aetiology but also to go beyond in translational research. This has opened a new special field of research known as 'biobanking', which focuses on how to collect, store and provide these specimens and data, and which is substantially supported by national and European funding. PURPOSE: An overview on biobanking is given, with a closer look on a clinical setting, concerning a necessary distinction from clinical trials and studies as well as a comparison of prospective sample collection with secondary use of archived samples from diagnostics. Based on a summary of possible use and scientific impact of human tissue in research, it is shown how surgical expertise boosts the scientific value of specimens and data. Finally, an assessment of legal and ethical issues especially from a surgical perspective is given, followed by a model of interdisciplinary biobanking within a joint 'centre' that as synergistic structure merges essential input from surgery as well as laboratory medicine, pathology and biometry. CONCLUSION: Within the domain of biobanking, surgeons have to develop a better awareness of their role within translational research, not only on the level of medical faculties but also as nationally and internationally funded initiatives. Therefore, the authors suggest a platform for biobanking within the German association of surgeons in analogy to the existing special interest group for clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: High-quality biospecimens of human origin with annotated clinical and procedural data are an important tool for biomedical research, not only to map physiology, pathophysiology and aetiology but also to go beyond in translational research. This has opened a new special field of research known as 'biobanking', which focuses on how to collect, store and provide these specimens and data, and which is substantially supported by national and European funding. PURPOSE: An overview on biobanking is given, with a closer look on a clinical setting, concerning a necessary distinction from clinical trials and studies as well as a comparison of prospective sample collection with secondary use of archived samples from diagnostics. Based on a summary of possible use and scientific impact of human tissue in research, it is shown how surgical expertise boosts the scientific value of specimens and data. Finally, an assessment of legal and ethical issues especially from a surgical perspective is given, followed by a model of interdisciplinary biobanking within a joint 'centre' that as synergistic structure merges essential input from surgery as well as laboratory medicine, pathology and biometry. CONCLUSION: Within the domain of biobanking, surgeons have to develop a better awareness of their role within translational research, not only on the level of medical faculties but also as nationally and internationally funded initiatives. Therefore, the authors suggest a platform for biobanking within the German association of surgeons in analogy to the existing special interest group for clinical trials.
Authors: Jürgen Simon; Rainer Paslack; Jürgen Robienski; David N Cooper; Jürgen W Goebel; Michael Krawczak Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2007-03-14 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: John S Luque; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Francisco A Montel-Ishino; Mariana Arevalo; Shalanda A Bynum; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Kristen J Wells; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Claudius Conrad; Yves Hüsemann; Hanno Niess; Irene von Luettichau; Ralf Huss; Christian Bauer; Karl-Walter Jauch; Christoph A Klein; Christiane Bruns; Peter J Nelson Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Lorena Peiró-Chova; María Peña-Chilet; José Antonio López-Guerrero; José Luis García-Giménez; Elisa Alonso-Yuste; Octavio Burgues; Ana Lluch; Jaime Ferrer-Lozano; Gloria Ribas Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Maryam Shabihkhani; Gregory M Lucey; Bowen Wei; Sergey Mareninov; Jerry J Lou; Harry V Vinters; Elyse J Singer; Timothy F Cloughesy; William H Yong Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Quinn T Ostrom; Karen Devine; Jordonna Fulop; Yingli Wolinsky; Peter Liao; Lindsay Stetson; Marta Couce; Andrew E Sloan; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2016-12-30
Authors: Serene M L Lee; Celine Schelcher; Reinhard Thasler; Tobias S Schiergens; Wolfgang E Thasler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 3.240