Literature DB >> 20639000

Visual motion perception induced by sounds in vertical plane.

Wataru Teramoto1, Yuko Manaka, Souta Hidaka, Yoichi Sugita, Ryota Miyauchi, Shuichi Sakamoto, Jiro Gyoba, Yukio Iwaya, Yôiti Suzuki.   

Abstract

The alternation of sounds in the left and right ears induces motion perception of a static visual stimulus (SIVM: Sound-Induced Visual Motion). In this case, binaural cues were of considerable benefit in perceiving locations and movements of the sounds. The present study investigated how a spectral cue - another important cue for sound localization and motion perception - contributed to the SIVM. In experiments, two alternating sound sources aligned in the vertical plane were presented, synchronized with a static visual stimulus. We found that the proportion of the SIVM and the magnitude of the perceived movements of the static visual stimulus increased with an increase of retinal eccentricity (1.875-30 degree), indicating the influence of the spectral cue on the SIVM. These findings suggest that the SIVM can be generalized to the whole two dimensional audio-visual space, and strongly imply that there are common neural substrates for auditory and visual motion perception in the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20639000     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  11 in total

1.  Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Maori Kobayashi; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.288

3.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Motor-induced visual motion: hand movements driving visual motion perception.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jeroen J Stekelenburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sounds move a static visual object.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita; Yuko Manaka; Shuichi Sakamoto; Yôiti Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Auditory motion capturing ambiguous visual motion.

Authors:  Arjen Alink; Felix Euler; Elena Galeano; Alexandra Krugliak; Wolf Singer; Axel Kohler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-02

8.  Audio-visual interaction in visual motion detection: Synchrony versus Asynchrony.

Authors:  Stephanie Rosemann; Inga-Maria Wefel; Volkan Elis; Manfred Fahle
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-02-23

Review 9.  Spatiotemporal Processing in Crossmodal Interactions for Perception of the External World: A Review.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-22

10.  Temporal Audiovisual Motion Prediction in 2D- vs. 3D-Environments.

Authors:  Sandra Dittrich; Tömme Noesselt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.