Literature DB >> 27915368

Touch-contingent visual motion perception: tactile events drive visual motion perception.

Ryo Teraoka1, Wataru Teramoto2.   

Abstract

It has recently been demonstrated that the brain rapidly forms an association between concurrently presented sound sequences and visual motion. Once this association has been formed, the associated sound sequence can drive visual motion perception. This phenomenon is known as "sound-contingent visual motion perception" (SCVM). In the present study, we addressed the possibility of a similar association involving touch instead of audition. In a 9-min exposure session, two circles placed side by side were alternately presented to produce apparent motion in a horizontal direction. The onsets of the circle presentations were synchronized with vibrotactile stimulation on two different positions of the forearm. We then quantified pre- and post-exposure perceptual changes using a motion-nulling procedure. Results showed that after prolonged exposure to visuotactile stimuli, the tactile sequence influenced visual motion perception. Notably, this effect was specific to the previously exposed visual field, thus ruling out the possibility of simple response bias. These findings suggest that SCVM-like associations occur, at least to some extent, for the other modality combinations. Furthermore, the effect did not occur when the forearm posture was changed between the exposure and test phases, suggesting that the association is formed after integrating proprioceptive information.

Keywords:  Association effect; Motion perception; Proprioception; Visuotactile interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27915368     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4850-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Where conscious sensation takes place.

Authors:  Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2002-09

2.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Maori Kobayashi; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Dynamic visual capture: apparent auditory motion induced by a moving visual target.

Authors:  S Mateeff; J Hohnsbein; T Noack
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Yuko Manaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita; Ryota Miyauchi; Jiro Gyoba; Yôiti Suzuki; Yukio Iwaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Sound frequency and aural selectivity in sound-contingent visual motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Maori Kobayashi; Wataru Teramoto; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Indiscriminable sounds determine the direction of visual motion.

Authors:  Maori Kobayashi; Wataru Teramoto; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Perception of body ownership is driven by Bayesian sensory inference.

Authors:  Majed Samad; Albert Jin Chung; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.