Literature DB >> 21568424

A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants.

Kostas Kokkinakis1, Oldooz Hazrati, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

Little is known about the extent to which reverberation affects speech intelligibility by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. Experiment 1 assessed CI users' performance using Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) sentences corrupted with varying degrees of reverberation. Reverberation times of 0.30, 0.60, 0.80, and 1.0 s were used. Results indicated that for all subjects tested, speech intelligibility decreased exponentially with an increase in reverberation time. A decaying-exponential model provided an excellent fit to the data. Experiment 2 evaluated (offline) a speech coding strategy for reverberation suppression using a channel-selection criterion based on the signal-to-reverberant ratio (SRR) of individual frequency channels. The SRR reflects implicitly the ratio of the energies of the signal originating from the early (and direct) reflections and the signal originating from the late reflections. Channels with SRR larger than a preset threshold were selected, while channels with SRR smaller than the threshold were zeroed out. Results in a highly reverberant scenario indicated that the proposed strategy led to substantial gains (over 60 percentage points) in speech intelligibility over the subjects' daily strategy. Further analysis indicated that the proposed channel-selection criterion reduces the temporal envelope smearing effects introduced by reverberation and also diminishes the self-masking effects responsible for flattened formants.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568424      PMCID: PMC3108395          DOI: 10.1121/1.3559683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.

Authors:  Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Multi-microphone adaptive noise reduction strategies for coordinated stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Sarah F Poissant; Nathaniel A Whitmal; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; T R Letowski; F M Tucker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A K Nabelek; J M Pickett
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1974-12

8.  Selective-Tap Blind Dereverberation for Two-Microphone Enhancement of Reverberant Speech.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Lett       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  23 in total

1.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Christina Runge; Qudsia Tahmina; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.

Authors:  Michelle Mason; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments.

Authors:  João F Santos; Stefano Cosentino; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Using channel-specific statistical models to detect reverberation in cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Jill M Desmond; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  [On the effect of reverberation on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners].

Authors:  R Mühler; M Ziese; D Rostalski; J L Verhey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Seyed Omid Sadjadi; Philipos C Loizou; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Predicting the intelligibility of reverberant speech for cochlear implant listeners with a non-intrusive intelligibility measure.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.880

10.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.