Literature DB >> 18646993

A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants.

Yi Hu1, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

In the n-of-m strategy, the signal is processed through m bandpass filters from which only the n maximum envelope amplitudes are selected for stimulation. While this maximum selection criterion, adopted in the advanced combination encoder strategy, works well in quiet, it can be problematic in noise as it is sensitive to the spectral composition of the input signal and does not account for situations in which the masker completely dominates the target. A new selection criterion is proposed based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of individual channels. The new criterion selects target-dominated (SNR > or = 0 dB) channels and discards masker-dominated (SNR<0 dB) channels. Experiment 1 assessed cochlear implant users' performance with the proposed strategy assuming that the channel SNRs are known. Results indicated that the proposed strategy can restore speech intelligibility to the level attained in quiet independent of the type of masker (babble or continuous noise) and SNR level (0-10 dB) used. Results from experiment 2 showed that a 25% error rate can be tolerated in channel selection without compromising speech intelligibility. Overall, the findings from the present study suggest that the SNR criterion is an effective selection criterion for n-of-m strategies with the potential of restoring speech intelligibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18646993      PMCID: PMC2564827          DOI: 10.1121/1.2924131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Patti L Arndt; Steven J Staller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Benefit of ACE compared to CIS and SPEAK coding strategies.

Authors:  H N Kim; Y J Shim; M H Chung; Y H Lee
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000

4.  Speech segregation based on sound localization.

Authors:  Nicoleta Roman; DeLiang Wang; Guy J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Pitch-based monaural segregation of reverberant speech.

Authors:  Nicoleta Roman; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation.

Authors:  Michael C Anzalone; Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou; Ning Li; Kalyan Kasturi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Architecture of the Spectra 22 speech processor.

Authors:  P Seligman; H McDermott
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09
View more
  16 in total

1.  A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Seyed Omid Sadjadi; Philipos C Loizou; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reasons why current speech-enhancement algorithms do not improve speech intelligibility and suggested solutions.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Gibak Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2011

4.  Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Jianfen Ma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of two channel selection criteria for noise suppression in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Lorraine A Delhorne; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effects of short-term computerized speech-in-noise training on postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Brienne Lee; Pamela Fiebig; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  A Dual-Microphone Speech Enhancement Algorithm Based on the Coherence Function.

Authors:  Nima Yousefian; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2011-07-18

10.  Speech enhancement for cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Dongmei Wang; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.