Literature DB >> 23007782

Quantitative ultrasound estimates from populations of scatterers with continuous size distributions: effects of the size estimator algorithm.

Roberto Lavarello1, Michael Oelze.   

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasonic techniques using backscatter coefficients (BSCs) may fail to produce physically meaningful estimates of effective scatterer diameter (ESD) when the analysis media contains scatterers of different sizes. In this work, three different estimator algorithms were used to produce estimates of ESD. The performance of the three estimators was compared over different frequency bands using simulations and experiments with physical phantoms. All estimators produced ESD estimates by comparing the estimated BSCs with a scattering model based on the backscattering cross section of a single spherical fluid scatterer. The first estimator consisted of minimizing the average square deviation of the logarithmically compressed ratio between the estimated BSCs and the scattering model. The second and third estimators consisted of minimizing the mean square error between the estimated BSCs and a linear transformation of the scattering model with and without considering an intercept, respectively. Simulations were conducted over several analysis bandwidths between 1 and 40 MHz from populations of scatterers with either a uniform size distribution or a distribution based on the inverse cubic of the size. Diameters of the distributions ranged between [25, 100], [25, 50], [50, 100], and [50, 75] μm. Experimental results were obtained from two gelatin phantoms containing cross-linked dextran gel spheres ranging in diameter from 28 to 130 μm and 70 to 130 μm, respectively, and 5-, 7.5-, 10-, and 13-MHz focused transducers. Significant differences in the performances of the ESD estimator algorithms as a function of the analysis frequency were observed. Specifically, the third estimator exhibited potential to produce physically meaningful ESD estimates even for large ka values when using a single-size scattering model if sufficient analysis bandwidth was available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23007782      PMCID: PMC3458580          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  21 in total

1.  Improved parametric imaging of scatterer size estimates using angular compounding.

Authors:  Anthony L Gerig; Tomy Varghese; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient quantitative estimates from Chinese hamster ovary cell pellet biophantoms.

Authors:  Maxime Teisseire; Aiguo Han; Rami Abuhabsah; James P Blue; Sandhya Sarwate; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved scatterer property estimates from ultrasound backscatter using gate-edge correction and a pseudo-Welch technique.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Parametric ultrasound imaging from backscatter coefficient measurements: image formation and interpretation.

Authors:  M F Insana; T J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  The measurement of backscatter coefficient from a broadband pulse-echo system: a new formulation.

Authors:  X Chen; D Phillips; K Q Schwarz; J G Mottley; K J Parker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Ultrasound characterization of red blood cell aggregation with intervening attenuating tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Emilie Franceschini; François T H Yu; François Destrempes; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.

Authors:  Roberto J Lavarello; Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Normalization of ultrasonic scattering measurements to obtain average differential scattering cross sections for tissues.

Authors:  J A Campbell; R C Waag
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Method of data reduction for accurate determination of acoustic backscatter coefficients.

Authors:  E L Madsen; M F Insana; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Janelle J Anderson; Maria-Teresa Herd; Michael R King; Alexander Haak; Zachary T Hafez; Jun Song; Michael L Oelze; Ernest L Madsen; James A Zagzebski; William D O'Brien; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.578

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.725

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.