Literature DB >> 25189857

Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.

Adam C Luchies1, Michael L Oelze2.   

Abstract

When using the backscatter coefficient (BSC) to estimate quantitative ultrasound parameters such as the effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and the effective acoustic concentration (EAC), it is necessary to assume that the interrogated medium contains diffuse scatterers. Structures that invalidate this assumption can affect the estimated BSC parameters in terms of increased bias and variance and decrease performance when classifying disease. In this work, a method was developed to mitigate the effects of echoes from structures that invalidate the assumption of diffuse scattering, while preserving as much signal as possible for obtaining diffuse scatterer property estimates. Backscattered signal sections that contained nondiffuse signals were identified and a windowing technique was used to provide BSC estimates for diffuse echoes only. Experiments from physical phantoms were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed BSC estimation methods. Tradeoffs associated with effective mitigation of specular scatterers and bias and variance introduced into the estimates were quantified. Analysis of the results suggested that discrete prolate spheroidal (PR) tapers with gaps provided the best performance for minimizing BSC error. Specifically, the mean square error for BSC between measured and theoretical had an average value of approximately 1.0 and 0.2 when using a Hanning taper and PR taper respectively, with six gaps. The BSC error due to amplitude bias was smallest for PR (Nω = 1) tapers. The BSC error due to shape bias was smallest for PR (Nω = 4) tapers. These results suggest using different taper types for estimating ESD versus EAC.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backscatter coefficient; quantitative ultrasound; spectral estimation; specular echoes; tapers with gaps

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25189857      PMCID: PMC4346322          DOI: 10.1177/0161734614549263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  19 in total

1.  Tissue characterization using the continuous wavelet transform. Part I: Decomposition method.

Authors:  G Georgiou; F S Cohen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Improved scatterer property estimates from ultrasound backscatter for small gate lengths using a gate-edge correction factor.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Parametric ultrasound imaging from backscatter coefficient measurements: image formation and interpretation.

Authors:  M F Insana; T J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  The measurement of backscatter coefficient from a broadband pulse-echo system: a new formulation.

Authors:  X Chen; D Phillips; K Q Schwarz; J G Mottley; K J Parker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  On modeling the tissue response from ultrasonic B-scan images.

Authors:  U R Abeyratne; A P Petropulu; J M Reid
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Analysis and classification of tissue with scatterer structure templates.

Authors:  K D Donohue; F Forsberg; C V Piccoli; B B Goldberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.

Authors:  Roberto J Lavarello; Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparison of theoretical scattering results and ultrasonic data from clinical liver examinations.

Authors:  F L Lizzi; D L King; M C Rorke; J Hui; M Ostromogilsky; M M Yaremko; E J Feleppa; P Wai
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Mean-scatterer spacing estimates with spectral correlation.

Authors:  T Varghese; K D Donohue
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Tissue characterization using the continuous wavelet transform. Part II: Application on breast RF data.

Authors:  G Georgiou; F S Cohen; C W Piccoli; F Forsberg; B B Goldberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Multi-Parameter Classifier for Breast Masses.

Authors:  Haidy G Nasief; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Quantifying Backscatter Anisotropy Using the Reference Phantom Method.

Authors:  Quinton W Guerrero; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Drehfal; Helen Feltovich; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Analysis of Coherent and Diffuse Scattering Using a Reference Phantom.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Drehfal; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.725

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.