Literature DB >> 17576150

The cost of event-based prospective memory: salient target events.

Rebekah E Smith1, R Reed Hunt, Jennifer C McVay, Melissa D McConnell.   

Abstract

Evidence has begun to accumulate showing that successful performance of event-based prospective memory (PM) comes at a cost to other ongoing activities. The current study builds on previous work by examining the cost associated with PM when the target event is salient. Target salience is among the criteria for automatic retrieval of intentions according to the multiprocess view of PM. An alternative theory, the preparatory attentional and memory processes theory, argues that PM performance, including retrieval of the intent, is never automatic and successful performance always will come at a cost to other ongoing activity. The 4 experiments reported here used a salient PM target event. In addition, Experiments 3 and 4 were designed to meet the stringent criteria proposed for automatic retrieval of intentions by multiprocess theory, and, yet, in all 4 experiments, delayed intentions interfered with ongoing task performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17576150     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  64 in total

1.  Prospective memory: are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection.

Authors:  Gene A Brewer; Justin B Knight; Richard L Marsh; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

3.  Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Aliza Gordon; Alexander Jaudas; Carmen Hefer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-28

4.  Resource depletion does not influence prospective memory in college students.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Michael J Cahill; Hillary G Mullet; Michael K Scullin; Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-09-08

5.  Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Rebecca Kearney; Roger Remington
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

6.  Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Alexander Jaudas; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

7.  Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

8.  ERPs and their brain sources in perceptual and conceptual prospective memory tasks: Commonalities and differences between the two tasks.

Authors:  Gabriela Cruz; Makoto Miyakoshi; Scott Makeig; Kerry Kilborn; Jonathan Evans
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Enhanced recognition of words previously presented in a task with nonfocal prospective memory requirements.

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Michael S Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

10.  The cognitive processes underlying event-based prospective memory in school-age children and young adults: a formal model-based study.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; Ute J Bayen; Claudia Martin
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2010-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.