Literature DB >> 20565226

Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007).

Gilles O Einstein1, Mark A McDaniel.   

Abstract

On the basis of consistently finding significant overall costs to the ongoing task with a single salient target event, Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007) concluded that preparatory attentional processes are required for prospective remembering and that spontaneous retrieval does not occur. In this article, we argue that overall costs are not completely informative in terms of specifying the underlying processes mediating prospective memory retrieval, and we suggest more promising approaches for testing for the existence of these processes. We also argue that counterbalancing in a within-subjects design is one of several proper methods for assessing costs. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20565226     DOI: 10.1037/a0019184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  41 in total

1.  Prospective memory: are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection.

Authors:  Gene A Brewer; Justin B Knight; Richard L Marsh; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

3.  Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

4.  Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

5.  Effects of delay of prospective memory cues in an ongoing task on prospective memory task performance.

Authors:  Dawn M McBride; Jaclyn K Beckner; Drew H Abney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

6.  Response dynamics in prospective memory.

Authors:  Drew H Abney; Dawn M McBride; Angela M Conte; David W Vinson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

7.  Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Ji Hae Lee; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

8.  Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill T Shelton; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

10.  Enhanced recognition of words previously presented in a task with nonfocal prospective memory requirements.

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Michael S Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.