Literature DB >> 21531416

Influence of material coupling and assembly condition on the magnitude of micromotion at the stem-neck interface of a modular hip endoprosthesis.

S Y Jauch1, G Huber, E Hoenig, M Baxmann, T M Grupp, M M Morlock.   

Abstract

Hip prostheses with a modular neck exhibit, compared to monobloc prostheses, an additional interface which bears the risk of fretting as well as corrosion. Failures at the neck adapter of modular prostheses have been observed for a number of different designs. It has been speculated that micromotions at the stem-neck interface were responsible for these implant failures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of material combinations and assembly conditions on the magnitude of micromotions at the stem-neck interface during cyclic loading. Modular (n = 24) and monobloc (n = 3) hip prostheses of a similar design (Metha, Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) were subjected to mechanical testing according to ISO 7206-4 (F(min) = 230N, F(max) = 2300N, f = 1Hz, n = 10,000 cycles). The neck adapters (Ti-6Al-4V or Co-Cr29-Mo alloy) were assembled with a clean or contaminated interface. The micromotion between stem and neck adapter was calculated at five reference points based on the measurements of the three eddy current sensors. The largest micromotions were observed at the lateral edge of the stem-neck taper connection, which is in accordance with the crack location of clinically failed prostheses. Titanium neck adapters showed significantly larger micromotions than cobalt-chromium neck adapters (p = 0.005). Contaminated interfaces also exhibited significantly larger micromotions (p < 0.001). Since excessive micromotions at the stem-neck interface might be involved in the process of implant failure, special care should be taken to clean the interface prior to assembly and titanium neck adapters with titanium stems should generally be used with caution.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21531416     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Is increased modularity associated with increased fretting and corrosion damage in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty devices?: a retrieval study.

Authors:  Genymphas B Higgs; Josa A Hanzlik; Daniel W MacDonald; Jeremy L Gilbert; Clare M Rimnac; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Cementless modular neck stems: are they a safe option in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  José M Pelayo-de-Tomás; José L Rodrigo-Pérez; Carlos D Novoa-Parra; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; María Morales-Suárez-Varela; José Antonio Blas-Dobón
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-29

3.  Contact conditions for total hip head-neck modular taper junctions with microgrooved stem tapers.

Authors:  Maren Bechstedt; Jonathan A Gustafson; Steven P Mell; Julian Gührs; Michael M Morlock; Brett R Levine; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Modern trunnions are more flexible: a mechanical analysis of THA taper designs.

Authors:  David A Porter; Robert M Urban; Joshua J Jacobs; Jeremy L Gilbert; José A Rodriguez; H John Cooper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Stem-Sleeve Junction Failure of a Modular Femoral Hip System: a Retrieval Analysis.

Authors:  Feras Waly; Fahad H Abduljabbar; Trevor Gascoyne; Thomas R Turgeon; Olga Huk
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-07-09

6.  The effect of manufacturing tolerances on the mechanical environment of taper junctions in modular TKR.

Authors:  Kyle Snethen; Jorge Hernandez; Melinda Harman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-04-18

7.  Does Taper Angle Clearance Influence Fretting and Corrosion Damage at the Head-Stem Interface? A Matched Cohort Retrieval Study.

Authors:  Sevi B Kocagöz; Richard J Underwood; Shiril Sivan; Jeremy L Gilbert; Daniel W Macdonald; Judd S Day; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-12-01

Review 8.  Corrosion of the Head-Stem Taper Junction-Are We on the Verge of an Epidemic?: Review Article.

Authors:  Michael Morlock; Dennis Bünte; Julian Gührs; Nicholas Bishop
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-09-20

9.  Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck.

Authors:  H John Cooper; Robert M Urban; Richard L Wixson; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions?

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Deborah J Hall; Nguyen Q Ha; Robert M Urban; Brett R Levine; Joshua J Jacobs; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.