Literature DB >> 32139099

Contact conditions for total hip head-neck modular taper junctions with microgrooved stem tapers.

Maren Bechstedt1, Jonathan A Gustafson2, Steven P Mell2, Julian Gührs1, Michael M Morlock1, Brett R Levine2, Hannah J Lundberg3.   

Abstract

Implant failure due to fretting-corrosion of head-neck modular junctions is a rising problem in total hip arthroplasty. Fretting-corrosion initiates when micromotion leads to metal release; however, factors leading to micromotion, such as microgrooves on the stem taper, are not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to describe a finite element analysis technique to determine head-neck contact mechanics and investigate the effect of stem taper microgroove height during head-neck assembly. Two-dimensional axisymmetric finite element models were created. Models were created for a ceramic femoral head and a CoCrMo femoral head against Ti6Al4V stem tapers and compared to available data from prior experiments. Stem taper microgroove height was investigated with a generic 12/14 model. Head-neck assembly was performed to four maximum loads (500 N, 2000 N, 4000 N, 8000 N). For the stem taper coupled with the ceramic head, the number of microgrooves in contact and plastically deformed differed by 2.5 microgrooves (4%) and 6.5 microgrooves (11%), respectively, between the finite element models and experiment. For the stem taper coupled with the CoCrMo head, all microgrooves were in contact after all assembly loads in the finite element model due to an almost identical conical angle between the taper surfaces. In the experiments, all grooves were only in contact for the 8000 N assembly load. Contact area, plastic (permanent) deformation, and contact pressure increased with increasing assembly loads and deeper microgrooves. The described modeling technique can be used to investigate the relationship between implant design factors, allowing for optimal microgroove design within material couples.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contact mechanics; Finite element analysis; Modularity; Surface topography; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32139099      PMCID: PMC7187651          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  26 in total

1.  Influence of geometry and materials on the axial and torsional strength of the head-neck taper junction in modular hip replacements: A finite element study.

Authors:  Khosro Fallahnezhad; Hamidreza Farhoudi; Reza H Oskouei; Mark Taylor
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-01-07

2.  What do we know about taper corrosion in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  J J Jacobs; H J Cooper; R M Urban; R L Wixson; C J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  What Factors Drive Taper Corrosion?

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Hannah J Lundberg; Deborah J Hall; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Influence of assembly procedure and material combination on the strength of the taper connection at the head-neck junction of modular hip endoprostheses.

Authors:  Annelie Rehmer; Nicholas E Bishop; Michael M Morlock
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Effect of manufacturing tolerances on the micromotion at the Morse taper interface in modular hip implants using the finite element technique.

Authors:  N Shareef; D Levine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  An adaptive finite element simulation of fretting wear damage at the head-neck taper junction of total hip replacement: The role of taper angle mismatch.

Authors:  Khosro Fallahnezhad; Reza H Oskouei; Hojjat Badnava; Mark Taylor
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-07-04

7.  Same Same but Different? 12/14 Stem and Head Tapers in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ulrike Mueller; Steffen Braun; Stefan Schroeder; Robert Sonntag; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  A finite element study on the mechanical response of the head-neck interface of hip implants under realistic forces and moments of daily activities: Part 2.

Authors:  Khosro Fallahnezhad; Hamidreza Farhoudi; Reza H Oskouei; Mark Taylor
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-09-07

9.  Diagnosis and Management of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions Secondary to Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction in Patients With Metal on Polyethylene Bearings.

Authors:  Darren R Plummer; Richard A Berger; Wayne G Paprosky; Scott M Sporer; Joshua J Jacobs; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Quantification of the Contact Area at the Head-Stem Taper Interface of Modular Hip Prostheses.

Authors:  Florian Witt; Julian Gührs; Michael M Morlock; Nicholas E Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads?

Authors:  Stephanie M McCarthy; Deborah J Hall; Mathew T Mathew; Joshua J Jacobs; Hannah J Lundberg; Robin Pourzal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Fretting-corrosion in hip taper modular junctions: The influence of topography and pH levels - An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Dmitry Royhman; Robin Pourzal; Deborah Hall; Hannah J Lundberg; Markus A Wimmer; Joshua Jacobs; Nadim J Hallab; Mathew T Mathew
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-03-12

3.  In vitro testing for hip head-neck taper tribocorrosion: A review of experimental methods.

Authors:  Christian M Wight; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  Variability in stem taper surface topography affects the degree of corrosion and fretting in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kilian Elia Stockhausen; Christoph Riedel; Alex Victoria Belinski; Dorothea Rothe; Thorsten Gehrke; Felix Klebig; Matthias Gebauer; Michael Amling; Mustafa Citak; Björn Busse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.