Literature DB >> 21518711

Novel approach to parental permission and child assent for research: improving comprehension.

Theresa A O'Lonergan1, Jeri E Forster-Harwood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to test a multimedia permission/assent (P/A) process. The overall hypothesis was that children and their parents exposed to a multimedia P/A process would have better comprehension compared with those exposed to a text-based process.
METHODS: Traditional and multimedia P/A processes were created by using an innovative learning-objective approach. A total of 194 parent-child dyads (children aged 11-14 years) were enrolled: 24 dyads in a prestudy testing P/A components for preference and effect on comprehension and 170 dyads in a randomized trial of a multimedia or paper P/A process for a hypothetical study. Participants were predominantly white and were from a metropolitan area served by a tertiary care pediatric hospital and outpatient facility. Comprehension of 8 essential elements of the P/A process was assessed.
RESULTS: The majority of prestudy subjects preferred the video version of the dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry description over the animated and paper versions combined (41 of 48 [85%]; P < .0001), and there were similar results for the abdominal ultrasound description (38 of 47 [81%]; P < .0001). Children exposed to the novel process showed significantly better overall comprehension compared with the paper P/A process (P = .0009), and there were highly significant differences in understanding of study procedures (P = .0002) and risks (P < .0001). The parental multimedia group had significantly better overall comprehension (P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Multimedia approaches to the research P/A process may improve overall understanding of research participation for children and parents. Improved understanding of study-specific research components (rather than research rights) may improve overall comprehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21518711      PMCID: PMC3387865          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  15 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.

Authors:  James Flory; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Educational interventions--computers for delivering education to children with respiratory illness and to their parents.

Authors:  Amy C McPherson; Cristine Glazebrook; Alan R Smyth
Journal:  Paediatr Respir Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.726

3.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Parental consent in paediatric clinical research.

Authors:  H Chappuy; F Doz; S Blanche; J-C Gentet; G Pons; J-M Tréluyer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Proxy informed consent in pediatric research: a review.

Authors:  M Cuttini
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Do they understand? (part I): parental consent for children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Do they understand? (part II): assent of children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Patient comprehension of an interactive, computer-based information program for cardiac catheterization: a comparison with standard information.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Mauro Moscucci; Colleen M Brennan-Martinez; Robert Levine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-09

10.  Child assent and parental permission in pediatric research.

Authors:  Wilma C Rossi; William Reynolds; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003
View more
  21 in total

1.  Use of mobile devices and the internet for multimedia informed consent delivery and data entry in a pediatric asthma trial: Study design and rationale.

Authors:  Kathryn Blake; Janet T Holbrook; Holly Antal; David Shade; H Timothy Bunnell; Suzanne M McCahan; Robert A Wise; Chris Pennington; Paul Garfinkel; Tim Wysocki
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  A cognitive approach for design of a multimedia informed consent video and website in pediatric research.

Authors:  Holly Antal; H Timothy Bunnell; Suzanne M McCahan; Chris Pennington; Tim Wysocki; Kathryn V Blake
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  The Optimistic Bias and Illusions of Control in Clinical Research.

Authors:  Lynn A Jansen
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

4.  A Tool Kit to Enhance the Informed Consent Process for Community-Engaged Pediatric Research.

Authors:  William J Heerman; Richard O White; Annie Hotop; Karen Omlung; Sharelle Armstrong; Irène Mathieu; Nancy E Sherwood; Shari L Barkin
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Informed consent in pediatric research.

Authors:  Tom Leibson; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Development and evaluation of a web-based assent for adolescents considering an HIV vaccine trial.

Authors:  Diane R Blake; Celeste A Lemay; Louise S Maranda; J Dennis Fortenberry; Margaret H Kearney; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2015-03-24

7.  Facilitating Informed Permission/Assent/Consent in Pediatric Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Do Illustrations Improve Children's Comprehension of Assent Documents?

Authors:  Kim G Adcock; Shirley M Hogan; Okan U Elci; Keri L Mills
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-07

9.  Adolescents with substance use disorder and assent/consent: Empirical data on understanding biobank risks in genomic research.

Authors:  Marilyn E Coors; Kristen M Raymond; Christian J Hopfer; Joseph Sakai; Shannon K McWilliams; Susan Young; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Parental comprehension of the benefits/risks of first-line randomised clinical trials in children with solid tumours: a two-stage cross-sectional interview study.

Authors:  Hélène Chappuy; Naim Bouazza; Veronique Minard-Colin; Catherine Patte; Laurence Brugières; Judith Landman-Parker; Anne Auvrignon; Dominique Davous; Hélène Pacquement; Daniel Orbach; Jean Marc Tréluyer; François Doz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.