Literature DB >> 12606902

Do they understand? (part II): assent of children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research.

Alan R Tait1, Terri Voepel-Lewis, Shobha Malviya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Participation of children in clinical research requires not only parental permission but also the assent of the child. Although there is no fixed age at which assent should be sought, investigators should obtain assent from children considered able to provide it. This study was designed to determine children's understanding of the elements of disclosure for studies in which they had assented to participate.
METHODS: The study population included 102 children aged 7-18 yr who had given their assent to participate in a clinical anesthesia or surgical study. Children were interviewed using a semistructured format to determine their understanding of eight core elements of disclosure for the study to which they had agreed to participate. Two independent assessors scored the children's levels of understanding of these elements.
RESULTS: The children's perceived level of understanding of the elements of disclosure was significantly greater than their measured understanding (7.0 +/- 2.4 vs 5.3 +/- 2.7, 0-10 scale; P< 0.0001). Complete understanding of the elements of disclosure for all children ranged from 30.4 to 89.4%. Children aged more than 11 yr had significantly greater understanding compared with younger children, particularly with respect to understanding of the study protocol, the benefits, and the freedom to withdraw.
CONCLUSIONS: Children approached for their assent to participate in a clinical anesthesia or surgery study have limited understanding of the elements of disclosure and their role as a research participant, particularly if they are aged less than 11 yr.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12606902     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200303000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  34 in total

1.  Novel approach to parental permission and child assent for research: improving comprehension.

Authors:  Theresa A O'Lonergan; Jeri E Forster-Harwood
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 3.  Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Allan V Prochazka; Aaron S Fink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?

Authors:  E C Winkler
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  A questionnaire on factors influencing children's assent and dissent to non-therapeutic research.

Authors:  O D Wolthers
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Ethics of involving children in health-related research: applying a decision-making framework to a clinical trial.

Authors:  Barbara Kelly; Marilyn J Mackay-Lyons
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 1.037

7.  Evaluation of a prototype interactive consent program for pediatric clinical trials: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Maureen McGonegal; Robert Levine
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A cognitive approach for design of a multimedia informed consent video and website in pediatric research.

Authors:  Holly Antal; H Timothy Bunnell; Suzanne M McCahan; Chris Pennington; Tim Wysocki; Kathryn V Blake
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Children's Decision-Making Involvement About Research Participation: Associations With Perceived Fairness and Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Chris Feudtner; Abbas F Jawad
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Enhancing patient understanding of medical procedures: evaluation of an interactive multimedia program with in-line exercises.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Stanley J Chetcuti; Colleen Brennan-Martinez; Robert Levine
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.