Literature DB >> 25420675

Informed consent in pediatric research.

Tom Leibson1, Gideon Koren.   

Abstract

Pediatric drug research is gradually becoming more and more accepted as the norm for assessing whether a drug is safe and efficacious for infants and children. The process of informed consent and assent for these trials presents a major challenge. The aim of this review is to map historical, ethical and legal aspects relevant to the challenges of informed consent in the setting of pediatric drug research. The impact of age, level of maturity and life circumstances on the process of obtaining informed consent as well as the relations between consent and assent are discussed. There appears to be a lack of regulatory clarity in the area of pediatric clinical trials; while numerous statements have been made regarding children's rights to autonomy and their ability to care for themselves and for younger ones, the ever changing status of adolescence is still difficult to translate to informed consent. This may delay scientific and clinical advancement for children who are at the very junction of being independent and not needing parental permission. Obtaining consent and assent for pediatric clinical trials is a delicate matter, as both parent and child need to agree to participate. The appropriate transfer of information to guardians and the children, especially concerning potential risks and benefits, is at the heart of informed consent, as it serves to protect both patient and physician. As many adults lack health literacy, one must ensure that guardians receive relevant information at a level and in forms they can understand regarding the trials their children are asked to participate in.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25420675     DOI: 10.1007/s40272-014-0108-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Drugs        ISSN: 1174-5878            Impact factor:   3.022


  33 in total

1.  The Nuremberg Code.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Novel approach to parental permission and child assent for research: improving comprehension.

Authors:  Theresa A O'Lonergan; Jeri E Forster-Harwood
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Fooling ourselves with child autonomy and assent in nontherapeutic clinical research.

Authors:  T F Ackerman
Journal:  Clin Res       Date:  1979-12

4.  Transitional paternalism: how shared normative powers give rise to the asymmetry of adolescent consent and refusal.

Authors:  Neil C Manson
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  School-based youth health nurses and adolescent decision-making concerning reproductive and sexual health advice: How can the law guide healthcare practitioners in this context?

Authors:  Malcolm K Smith; Nikola Stepanov
Journal:  Contemp Nurse       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.787

6.  Accuracy of the MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR) for measuring children's competence to consent to clinical research.

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Robert Lindeboom; Marc A Benninga; C Michel Zwaan; Johannes B van Goudoever; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  The tuskegee syphilis study.

Authors:  W J Curran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  How North Carolina laws affect the care of adolescents. Issues of confidentiality and consent.

Authors:  D P Krowchuk; W Satterwhite; B C Moore
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  1994-11

9.  Comprehension of a simplified assent form in a vaccine trial for adolescents.

Authors:  Sonia Lee; Bill G Kapogiannis; Patricia M Flynn; Bret J Rudy; James Bethel; Sushma Ahmad; Diane Tucker; Sue Ellen Abdalian; Dannie Hoffman; Craig M Wilson; Coleen K Cunningham
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Invited commentary: broadening the evidence for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and education in the United States.

Authors:  Amy T Schalet; John S Santelli; Stephen T Russell; Carolyn T Halpern; Sarah A Miller; Sarah S Pickering; Shoshana K Goldberg; Jennifer M Hoenig
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2014-09-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  Attitudes of Mothers Regarding Willingness to Enroll Their Children in Research.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Maryam Rostami; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.

Authors:  Omar F Khabour; Mahmoud A Alomari; Nihaya A Al-Sheyab
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Creating a new ethical climate for drug research in children and pregnant women.

Authors:  Doreen Matsui; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  A didactic approach to presenting verbal and visual information to children participating in research protocols: the comic book informed assent.

Authors:  Thaís Massetti; Tânia Brusque Crocetta; Regiani Guarnieri; Talita Dias da Silva; Andrea Fernanda Leal; Mariana Callil Voos; Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Consent and recruitment: the reporting of paediatric trials published in 2012.

Authors:  Allison Gates; Patrina Caldwell; Sarah Curtis; Leonila Dans; Ricardo M Fernandes; Lisa Hartling; Lauren E Kelly; Katrina Williams; Kerry Woolfall; Michele P Dyson
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2018-11-26

6.  Improved parental understanding by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomized controlled study nested in a paediatric drug trial.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Chanchai Traivaree; Charnunnut Tiyapsane; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Expectations and experience: Parent and patient perspectives regarding treatment for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID).

Authors:  Heather Smith; Christopher Scalchunes; Morton J Cowan; Jennifer Puck; Jennifer Heimall
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Child's objection to non-beneficial research: capacity and distress based models.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora; Joanna Różyńska; Jan Piasecki
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03

9.  Investigator-initiated randomized controlled trials in children with epilepsy: Mission impossible?

Authors:  Amerins Weijenberg; Petra M C Callenbach; Oebele F Brouwer
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2016-11-14

10.  Active Cervical Range of Motion in Babies with Positional Plagiocephaly: Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Iñaki Pastor-Pons; María Orosia Lucha-López; Marta Barrau-Lalmolda; Iñaki Rodes-Pastor; Ángel Luis Rodríguez-Fernández; César Hidalgo-García; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.