Literature DB >> 9609494

The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

H B Jimison1, P P Sher, R Appleyard, Y LeVernois.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the project was to create recommendations and design specifications for a multimedia tool to enhance the informed consent process for clinical trials. The authors focused on the needs of patients with potential cognitive impairment.
DESIGN: The authors first performed a needs assessment using focus groups and interviews with health care researchers, institutional review board members, and three groups of patients (who had depression, breast cancer, or schizophrenia). Their feedback was incorporated into the design of a prototype multimedia tool. The design included general modules with information about clinical trials and informed consent as well as trial-specific modules. The authors then used the resulting prototype multimedia tool for informed consent in follow-up focus groups and interviews to obtain feedback on the feasibility and potential effectiveness of using such a tool routinely for clinical trials.
RESULTS: The authors showed that it was feasible to adapt a structured multimedia informed consent system to a specific clinical trial and to incorporate techniques to improve the understandability of informed consent content. Patients generally felt the prototype system was useful and could replace the paper document. They felt using the system would be less stressful, because they would have a greater sense of control and could proceed at their own pace. They liked the hierarchic and modular approach to providing information and felt that the use of video made information more understandable. Researchers and institutional review board members also found the system to be valuable in these ways but had concerns about how to review the system for potential biases in presentation and about the legal issues associated with replacing the paper document.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9609494      PMCID: PMC61298          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  65 in total

1.  Lowering the silent barriers to compliance for patients with low literacy skills.

Authors:  L G Doak; C C Doak
Journal:  Promot Health       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug

2.  OTC labels: can consumers read and understand them?

Authors:  G A Holt; J D Hollon; S E Hughes; R Coyle
Journal:  Am Pharm       Date:  1990-11

3.  Informed consent and the elderly. An ethical challenge for critical care nursing.

Authors:  D A Buehler
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.326

4.  Effects of writing/speaking on comprehension of information for informed consent.

Authors:  J M Sorrell
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 5.  Computer applications for staff development and patient education.

Authors:  K J Hannah; P Conley-Price; D Fenty; E McKiel; D Soltes; T Hogan; D Wiens
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 6.  A literature review on the efficacy of video in patient education.

Authors:  M E Gagliano
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1988-10

7.  Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.

Authors:  K J Tarnowski; D M Allen; C Mayhall; P A Kelly
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  A randomized controlled trial comparing quantitative informed consent formats.

Authors:  D L Simel; J R Feussner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Informing the elderly. A comparison of four methods.

Authors:  A J Tymchuk; J G Ouslander; N Rader
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 10.  Informed consent: an overview.

Authors:  C G Varricchio; P F Jassak
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.315

View more
  28 in total

1.  Novel approach to parental permission and child assent for research: improving comprehension.

Authors:  Theresa A O'Lonergan; Jeri E Forster-Harwood
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Babette Brumback; Janice L Krieger; Kenneth W Goodman; Arch G Mainous; Ray E Moseley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Using formative research to develop a context-specific approach to informed consent for clinical trials.

Authors:  Amy L Corneli; Margaret E Bentley; James R Sorenson; Gail E Henderson; Charles van der Horst; Agnes Moses; Jacqueline Nkhoma; Lyson Tenthani; Yusuf Ahmed; Charles M Heilig; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Building an Informed Consent Tool Starting with the Patient: The Patient-Centered Virtual Multimedia Interactive Informed Consent (VIC).

Authors:  Fuad Abujarad; Sandra Alfano; Tiffani J Bright; Sneha Kannoth; Nicole Grant; Matthew Gueble; Peter Peduzzi; Geoffrey Chupp
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

5.  Knowing what to do: international perspectives on the roles of clinical guidelines and patient preferences in patient care.

Authors:  P F Brennan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  A mobile/web app for long distance caregivers of older adults: functional requirements and design implications from a user centered design process.

Authors:  Steven S Williamson; Paul N Gorman; Holly B Jimison
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

7.  The role of nonverbal and verbal communication in a multimedia informed consent process.

Authors:  Joseph M Plasek; David S Pieczkiewicz; Andrea N Mahnke; Catherine A McCarty; Justin B Starren; Bonnie L Westra
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects.

Authors:  James Dubois; Holly Bante; Whitney B Hadley
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011-12-06

Review 9.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Clinical outcomes associated with attempts to educate patients about lower endoscopy: a narrative review.

Authors:  John M Coombes; John F Steiner; David B Bekelman; Allan V Prochazka; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.