OBJECTIVES: Within the socio-ecologic framework, diet and physical activity are influenced by individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy factors. A basic principle underlying this framework is that environments can influence an individual's behavior. However, in the vast majority of cross-sectional and even the few longitudinal studies of this relationship, the question of whether individuals select their area of residence based on physical activity-related amenities is ignored. In this paper, we address a critical methodological issue: self-selection of residential location, which is generally not accounted for, and can significantly compromise research on the relationship between environmental factors and physical activity behaviors. METHOD: We define and discuss the problem of residential self-selection in the study of neighborhood influences on health and health behavior, review methods used to control for residential self-selection in the literature, and present our strategy for addressing this potentially important source of bias. CONCLUSION: Existing research has built our understanding of residential self-selection bias, but important gaps remain. Our strategy uses data from a longitudinal cohort study linked to contemporaneous environmental measures to create a multi-equation model system to simultaneously estimate residential choice, environmental influences on physical activity, and downstream health outcomes such as obesity and clinical cardiovascular disease risk factor measures.
OBJECTIVES: Within the socio-ecologic framework, diet and physical activity are influenced by individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy factors. A basic principle underlying this framework is that environments can influence an individual's behavior. However, in the vast majority of cross-sectional and even the few longitudinal studies of this relationship, the question of whether individuals select their area of residence based on physical activity-related amenities is ignored. In this paper, we address a critical methodological issue: self-selection of residential location, which is generally not accounted for, and can significantly compromise research on the relationship between environmental factors and physical activity behaviors. METHOD: We define and discuss the problem of residential self-selection in the study of neighborhood influences on health and health behavior, review methods used to control for residential self-selection in the literature, and present our strategy for addressing this potentially important source of bias. CONCLUSION: Existing research has built our understanding of residential self-selection bias, but important gaps remain. Our strategy uses data from a longitudinal cohort study linked to contemporaneous environmental measures to create a multi-equation model system to simultaneously estimate residential choice, environmental influences on physical activity, and downstream health outcomes such as obesity and clinical cardiovascular disease risk factor measures.
Authors: Mia A Papas; Anthony J Alberg; Reid Ewing; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Tiffany L Gary; Ann C Klassen Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2007-05-28 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew Rundle; Sam Field; Yoosun Park; Lance Freeman; Christopher C Weiss; Kathryn Neckerman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Byoungjun Kim; Seann D Regan; Denton Callander; William C Goedel; Basile Chaix; Dustin T Duncan Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Sophie E Claudel; Joel Adu-Brimpong; Alnesha Banks; Colby Ayers; Michelle A Albert; Sandeep R Das; James A de Lemos; Tammy Leonard; Ian J Neeland; Joshua P Rivers; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Hannah Cohen-Cline; Shirley A A Beresford; Wendy Elizabeth Barrington; Ross L Matsueda; Jon Wakefield; Glen E Duncan Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Elizabeth Tarlov; Coady Wing; Stephen A Matthews; Kelly Jones; Hao Tong; Lisa M Powell Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Tanya R Berry; John C Spence; Chris M Blanchard; Nicoleta Cutumisu; Joy Edwards; Genevieve Selfridge Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 6.457