PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Health professionals are presented with the challenge of prescribing physical activity that is likely to be sustained by the sedentary majority. Walking is eminently suited to physical activity prescription for inactive individuals as it is accessible to men and women of all ages and social groups and poses little risk of injury. This paper reviews recent evidence of the health benefits of walking and promotion of walking behavior. RECENT FINDINGS: Large observational studies consistently show associations between walking and cardiovascular disease endpoints over long periods of follow-up. Intervention studies further support the health benefits of walking, showing improvements in clinical biomarkers and measures after shorter periods of follow-up. Walking appears to have cardiovascular disease-related health benefits in younger, middle-aged, and older men and women, in both healthy and patient populations. Pedometer-based, mobile phone-based, and computer-based programs are effective in increasing walking levels. Neighborhood and workplace amenities and programs may be important supports for walking behaviors. SUMMARY: Walking has the potential to play a key role in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clinicians can prescribe walking to assist patients meet physical activity recommendations and help identify supports available to the patient.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Health professionals are presented with the challenge of prescribing physical activity that is likely to be sustained by the sedentary majority. Walking is eminently suited to physical activity prescription for inactive individuals as it is accessible to men and women of all ages and social groups and poses little risk of injury. This paper reviews recent evidence of the health benefits of walking and promotion of walking behavior. RECENT FINDINGS: Large observational studies consistently show associations between walking and cardiovascular disease endpoints over long periods of follow-up. Intervention studies further support the health benefits of walking, showing improvements in clinical biomarkers and measures after shorter periods of follow-up. Walking appears to have cardiovascular disease-related health benefits in younger, middle-aged, and older men and women, in both healthy and patient populations. Pedometer-based, mobile phone-based, and computer-based programs are effective in increasing walking levels. Neighborhood and workplace amenities and programs may be important supports for walking behaviors. SUMMARY: Walking has the potential to play a key role in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clinicians can prescribe walking to assist patients meet physical activity recommendations and help identify supports available to the patient.
Authors: Kylie Ball; Anna Timperio; Jo Salmon; Billie Giles-Corti; Rebecca Roberts; David Crawford Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Mia A Papas; Anthony J Alberg; Reid Ewing; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Tiffany L Gary; Ann C Klassen Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2007-05-28 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: David M Williams; Charles E Matthews; Candace Rutt; Melissa A Napolitano; Bess H Marcus Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: X Guo; Z Jia; P Zhang; S Yang; W Wu; L Sang; Y Luo; X Lu; H Dai; Z Zeng; W Wang Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2009-01-09 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Yvonne L Michael; Leslie A Perdue; Eric S Orwoll; Marcia L Stefanick; Lynn M Marshall Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Daniel A Rodriguez; Gi-Hyoug Cho; John P Elder; Terry L Conway; Kelly R Evenson; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Elizabeth Shay; Deborah Cohen; Sara Veblen-Mortenson; Julie Pickrell; Leslie Lytle Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2011-05-11
Authors: Benjamin T Schumacher; John Bellettiere; Michael J LaMonte; Kelly R Evenson; Chongzhi Di; I-Min Lee; David A Sleet; Charles B Eaton; Cora E Lewis; Karen L Margolis; Lesley F Tinker; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2021-10-09 Impact factor: 2.109
Authors: Takemi Sugiyama; Ester Cerin; Neville Owen; Adewale L Oyeyemi; Terry L Conway; Delfien Van Dyck; Jasper Schipperijn; Duncan J Macfarlane; Deborah Salvo; Rodrigo S Reis; Josef Mitáš; Olga L Sarmiento; Rachel Davey; Grant Schofield; Rosario Orzanco-Garralda; James F Sallis Journal: Health Place Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Jelle Van Cauwenberg; Peter Clarys; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Veerle Van Holle; Dominique Verté; Nico De Witte; Liesbeth De Donder; Tine Buffel; Sarah Dury; Benedicte Deforche Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.918