Literature DB >> 18954927

Personal and neighborhood socioeconomic status and indices of neighborhood walk-ability predict body mass index in New York City.

Andrew Rundle1, Sam Field, Yoosun Park, Lance Freeman, Christopher C Weiss, Kathryn Neckerman.   

Abstract

Past research has observed inverse associations between neighborhood and personal level measures of socioeconomic status and body mass index (BMI), but has not assessed how personal and neighborhood-level measures might interact together to predict BMI. Using a sample of 13,102 adult residents of New York City who participated in a health survey, cross-sectional multi-level analyses assessed whether personal income, education and Zip code-level poverty rates were associated with BMI. Demographic, income, education and objectively measured height and weight data were collected in the survey and poverty rates and the proportion of Black and Hispanic residents in the subject's Zip code were retrieved from the 2000 Census. Zip code-level population density and land use mix, indices of neighborhood walk-ability which are often higher in lower income neighborhoods and are associated with lower BMI, were also measured. After controlling for individual and Zip code-level demographic characteristics, increasing income was associated with lower BMI in women but not in men, and college and graduate level education was associated with lower BMI in both men and women. After control for income and individual and Zip code-level demographic characteristics, higher Zip code poverty rate was unassociated with BMI. However, as expected, indices of neighborhood walk-ability acted as substantial inverse confounders in the relationship between Zip code poverty rate and BMI. After further adjustment for indices of neighborhood walk-ability, Zip code poverty rate became significantly, and positively associated with BMI in women. Among women, the inverse association between income and BMI was significantly stronger in richer compared to poorer Zip codes. In men and women, the association between college and graduate education and lower BMI was significantly stronger in richer versus poorer Zip codes. These analyses suggest that neighborhood socioeconomic context influences how personal socioeconomic status interact in predicting boby size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18954927      PMCID: PMC2735120          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  29 in total

1.  Associations of neighborhood characteristics with the location and type of food stores.

Authors:  Latetia V Moore; Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Black and white females' perceptions of ideal body size and social norms.

Authors:  K A Kemper; R G Sargent; J W Drane; R F Valois; J R Hussey
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1994-03

3.  You are where you shop: grocery store locations, weight, and neighborhoods.

Authors:  Sanae Inagami; Deborah A Cohen; Brian Karl Finch; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Weight and place: a multilevel cross-sectional survey of area-level social disadvantage and overweight/obesity in Australia.

Authors:  T King; A M Kavanagh; D Jolley; G Turrell; D Crawford
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Neighbourhood level versus individual level correlates of women's body dissatisfaction: toward a multilevel understanding of the role of affluence.

Authors:  L McLaren; L Gauvin
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review.

Authors:  Kylie Ball; David Crawford
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Ethnic differences in preferences for female weight and waist-to-hip ratio: a comparison of African-American and White American college and community samples.

Authors:  Rachel E K Freedman; Michele M Carter; Tracy Sbrocco; James J Gray
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2004-07

8.  Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars.

Authors:  Lawrence D Frank; Martin A Andresen; Thomas L Schmid
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States.

Authors:  Ronette R Briefel; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 10.  Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Sobal; A J Stunkard
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  36 in total

1.  Environment and Physical Activity Dynamics: The Role of Residential Self-selection.

Authors:  Janne Boone-Heinonen; Penny Gordon-Larsen; David K Guilkey; David R Jacobs; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2011-01-01

2.  Reconsidering access: park facilities and neighborhood disamenities in New York City.

Authors:  Christopher C Weiss; Marnie Purciel; Michael Bader; James W Quinn; Gina Lovasi; Kathryn M Neckerman; Andrew G Rundle
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Hispanic immigrant women's perspective on healthy foods and the New York City retail food environment: A mixed-method study.

Authors:  Yoosun Park; James Quinn; Karen Florez; Judith Jacobson; Kathryn Neckerman; Andrew Rundle
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Neighborhood SES is particularly important to the cardiovascular health of low SES individuals.

Authors:  Jennifer Morozink Boylan; Stephanie A Robert
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Socio-economic status, neighbourhood food environments and consumption of fruits and vegetables in New York City.

Authors:  Darby Jack; Kathryn Neckerman; Ofira Schwartz-Soicher; Gina S Lovasi; James Quinn; Catherine Richards; Michael Bader; Christopher Weiss; Kevin Konty; Peter Arno; Deborah Viola; Bonnie Kerker; Andrew Rundle
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  There goes the neighborhood effect: bias owing to nondifferential measurement error in the construction of neighborhood contextual measures.

Authors:  Stephen J Mooney; Catherine A Richards; Andrew G Rundle
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  A prospective study of socioeconomic status, prostate cancer screening and incidence among men at high risk for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Kathryn M Neckerman; Daniel Sheehan; Michelle Jankowski; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Deliang Tang; Benjamin A Rybicki
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Obesity and future prostate cancer risk among men after an initial benign biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Michelle Jankowski; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Deliang Tang; Benjamin A Rybicki
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Objectively measured physical activity and body mass index in preschool children.

Authors:  Susana Maria Coelho Guimarães Vale; Rute Marina Roberto Santos; Luísa Maria da Cruz Soares-Miranda; Carla Marisa Maia Moreira; Jonatan R Ruiz; Jorge Augusto Silva Mota
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-11

10.  The complexities of measuring access to parks and physical activity sites in New York City: a quantitative and qualitative approach.

Authors:  Andrew R Maroko; Juliana A Maantay; Nancy L Sohler; Kristen L Grady; Peter S Arno
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.