Sophie E Claudel1, Joel Adu-Brimpong1, Alnesha Banks2, Colby Ayers3, Michelle A Albert4, Sandeep R Das3, James A de Lemos3, Tammy Leonard5, Ian J Neeland3, Joshua P Rivers1, Tiffany M Powell-Wiley6. 1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 2. Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN. 3. Cardiology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. 5. Economics Department, University of North Texas, Denton, TX. 6. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: tiffany.powell-wiley@nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a leading economic and medical burden in the United States (US). As an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hypertension represents a critical point of intervention. Less is known about longitudinal effects of neighborhood deprivation on blood pressure outcomes, especially in light of new hypertension guidelines. METHODS: Longitudinal data from the Dallas Heart Study facilitated multilevel regression analysis of the relationship between neighborhood deprivation, blood pressure change, and incident hypertension over a 9-year period. Factor analysis explored neighborhood perception, which was controlled for in all analyses. Neighborhood deprivation was derived from US Census data and divided into tertiles for analysis. Hypertension status was compared using pre-2017 and 2017 hypertension guidelines. RESULTS: After adjusting for covariates, including moving status and residential self-selection, we observed significant associations between residing in the more deprived neighborhoods and 1) increasing blood pressure over time and 2) incident hypertension. In the fully adjusted model of continuous blood pressure change, significant relationships were seen for both medium (SBP: β = 4.81, SE = 1.39, P = .0005; DBP: β = 2.61, SE = 0.71, P = .0003) and high deprivation (SBP: β = 7.64, SE = 1.55, P < .0001; DBP: β = 4.64, SE = 0.78, P < .0001). In the fully adjusted model of incident hypertension, participants in areas of high deprivation had 1.69 higher odds of developing HTN (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.02, 2.82), as defined by 2017 hypertension guidelines. Results varied based on definition of hypertension used (pre-2017 vs. 2017 guidelines). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the potential impact of adverse neighborhood conditions on cardiometabolic outcomes, such as hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular disease is a leading economic and medical burden in the United States (US). As an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease, hypertension represents a critical point of intervention. Less is known about longitudinal effects of neighborhood deprivation on blood pressure outcomes, especially in light of new hypertension guidelines. METHODS: Longitudinal data from the Dallas Heart Study facilitated multilevel regression analysis of the relationship between neighborhood deprivation, blood pressure change, and incident hypertension over a 9-year period. Factor analysis explored neighborhood perception, which was controlled for in all analyses. Neighborhood deprivation was derived from US Census data and divided into tertiles for analysis. Hypertension status was compared using pre-2017 and 2017 hypertension guidelines. RESULTS: After adjusting for covariates, including moving status and residential self-selection, we observed significant associations between residing in the more deprived neighborhoods and 1) increasing blood pressure over time and 2) incident hypertension. In the fully adjusted model of continuous blood pressure change, significant relationships were seen for both medium (SBP: β = 4.81, SE = 1.39, P = .0005; DBP: β = 2.61, SE = 0.71, P = .0003) and high deprivation (SBP: β = 7.64, SE = 1.55, P < .0001; DBP: β = 4.64, SE = 0.78, P < .0001). In the fully adjusted model of incident hypertension, participants in areas of high deprivation had 1.69 higher odds of developing HTN (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.02, 2.82), as defined by 2017 hypertension guidelines. Results varied based on definition of hypertension used (pre-2017 vs. 2017 guidelines). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the potential impact of adverse neighborhood conditions on cardiometabolic outcomes, such as hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Ana V Diez Roux; Lloyd Chambless; Sharon Stein Merkin; Donna Arnett; Marsha Eigenbrodt; F Javier Nieto; Moyses Szklo; Paul Sorlie Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-08-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mahasin S Mujahid; Ana V Diez Roux; Richard C Cooper; Steven Shea; David R Williams Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Jeffrey J Wing; Ella August; Sara D Adar; Andrew L Dannenberg; Anjum Hajat; Brisa N Sánchez; James H Stein; Matthew C Tattersall; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mahasin S Mujahid; Ana V Diez Roux; Jeffrey D Morenoff; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Richard S Cooper; Hanyu Ni; Steven Shea Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Flora I Matheson; Heather L White; Rahim Moineddin; James R Dunn; Richard H Glazier Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Rebecca Cooper-McCann; Colby Ayers; David Berrigan; Min Lian; Michael McClurkin; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Sandeep R Das; Christine M Hoehner; Tammy Leonard Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Alana A Lewis; Colby R Ayers; Elizabeth Selvin; Ian Neeland; Christie M Ballantyne; Vijay Nambi; Ambarish Pandey; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Mark H Drazner; Mercedes R Carnethon; Jarett D Berry; Stephen L Seliger; Christopher R DeFilippi; James A de Lemos Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carmen Giurgescu; Alexandra L Nowak; Shannon Gillespie; Timiya S Nolan; Cindy M Anderson; Jodi L Ford; Daryl B Hood; Karen Patricia Williams Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Kimberly L Savin; Scott C Roesch; Eyal Oren; Jordan A Carlson; Matthew A Allison; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; James F Sallis; Marta M Jankowska; Gregory A Talavera; Tasi M Rodriguez; Earle C Chambers; Martha Daviglus; Krista M Perreira; Maria M Llabre; Linda C Gallo Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Mario Sims; Kiarri N Kershaw; Khadijah Breathett; Elizabeth A Jackson; Lisa M Lewis; Mahasin S Mujahid; Shakira F Suglia Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-07-15
Authors: Dathan C Gleichmann; Isabel Solis; Jacqueline R Janowich; Yu-Ping Wang; Vince D Calhoun; Tony W Wilson; Julia M Stephen Journal: Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Date: 2020-09-25
Authors: Utibe R Essien; Megan E McCabe; Kiarri N Kershaw; Quentin R Youmans; Michael J Fine; Clyde W Yancy; Sadiya S Khan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Veronica Barcelona; Eileen M Condon; Cindy A Crusto; Jacquelyn Y Taylor Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2021 Set/Oct 01 Impact factor: 2.364