| Literature DB >> 21510885 |
Bernard Nkrumah1, Samuel Blay Nguah, Nimako Sarpong, Denise Dekker, Ali Idriss, Juergen May, Yaw Adu-Sarkodie.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In resource poor settings where automated hematology analyzers are not available, the Cyanmethemoglobin method is often used. This method though cheaper, takes more time. In blood donations, the semi-quantitative gravimetric copper sulfate method which is very easy and inexpensive may be used but does not provide an acceptable degree of accuracy. The HemoCue® hemoglobin photometer has been used for these purposes. This study was conducted to generate data to support or refute its use as a point-of-care device for hemoglobin estimation in mobile blood donations and critical care areas in health facilities.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21510885 PMCID: PMC3095531 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-11-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Clin Pathol ISSN: 1472-6890
Summary of subject categories in the various subgroups
| Study Subgroup | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Children | Pre-School Children | Pregnant Women | Adult Men | Non-pregnant Women | Overall | |
| Number (%) | 89 (22.4) | 87 (21.9) | 73 (18.3) | 66 (16.6) | 83 (20.8) | 100 |
| Male n (%) | 51 (57.5) | 50 (57.5) | 0 | 66 (100.0) | 0 | 167 (42.0) |
| Mean (SD) | 7.8 (2.3) | 2.3 (1.1) | 27.2 (5.8) | 34.3 (12.3) | 30.9 (11.7) | 19.4 (15.2) |
| 95% CI | 7.3-8.3 | 2.1-2.6 | 25.8-28.6 | 31.2-37.3 | 28.4-33.5 | 17.9-20.9 |
| Range | 5-14 | 1-4 | 17-41 | 16-59 | 12-64 | 1-64 |
| Mean (SD) | 9.8 (3.1) | 9.3 (2.9) | 11.1 (1.7) | 11.4 (3.3) | 10.8 (2.5) | 10.4 (2.8) |
| 95% CI | 9.1-10.4 | 8.7-9.9 | 10.7-11.5 | 10.6-12.2 | 10.3-11.3 | 10.1-10.7 |
| Range | 3.3-20.3 | 2.7-16.8 | 5.6-16.6 | 3.2-16.8 | 2.9-16.7 | 2.7-20.3 |
| Mean (SD) | 9.6 (3.1) | 9.1 (2.9) | 10.9 (1.6) | 11.3 (3.4) | 10.7 (2.4) | 10.2 (2.9) |
| 95% CI | 8.9-10.3 | 8.5-9.8 | 10.5-11.3 | 10.4-12.1 | 10.1-11.2 | 10.0-10.5 |
| Range | 2.7-20.4 | 2.4-16.9 | 5.5-16.0 | 3.3-16.9 | 2.9-16.6 | 2.4-20.4 |
| Mean (SD) | 9.6 (3.1) | 9.2 (2.9) | 11.0 (1.7) | 11.3 (3.3) | 10.7 (2.5) | 10.3 (2.8) |
| 95% CI | 9.0-10.3 | 8.6-9.8 | 10.6-11.4 | 10.4-12.1 | 10.1-11.2 | 10.0-10.5 |
| Range | 2.9-20.4 | 2.5-16.4 | 5.5-16.3 | 3.0-16.7 | 2.7-16.5 | 2.5-20.4 |
Bland and Altman methods comparison
| Bland and Altman | |||
| Limit of agreement (p-value) | - 0.39 to 0.64 (0.843) | - 0.39 to 0.69 (0.39) | - 0.45 to 0.49 (0.441) |
| Mean difference (95%CI) | 0.13 (0.10 to 0.15) | 0.15 (0.120 to 0.174) | 0.02 (-0.00 to 0.04) |
| Concordance Correlation Coefficient | |||
| rho (95% CI) | 0.995 (0.994 to 0.996) | 0.994 (0.993 to 0.995) | 0.997 (0.996 to 0.997) |
| p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
¥ HemoCue * Cyanmethemoglobin
Figure 1Bland and Altman plot for HemoCue and Cyanmethemoglobin. Mean of HemoCue and Cyanmethemoglobin (g/dl).
Figure 2Bland and Altman plot for HemoCue and Sysmex KX21N. Mean of HemoCue and Sysmex (g/dl).
Within subject analysis of measured Hb for various study populations
| Study Subgroup | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School Children | Pre-School Children | Pregnant Women | Adult Men | Non-pregnant Women | ||
| Intraclass correlation | ||||||
| Coefficient | 0.997 | 0.995 | 0.986 | 0.996 | 0.993 | |
| 95% CI | 0.996 to 0.998 | 0.994 to 0.997 | 0.980 to 0.991 | 0.995 to 0.998 | 0.990 to 0.995 | |
| Estimated Reliability | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 0.999 | 0.998 | |