Literature DB >> 9613300

Evaluation of the HemoCue for measuring intra-operative haemoglobin concentrations: a comparison with the Coulter Max-M.

A M Lardi1, C Hirst, A J Mortimer, C N McCollum.   

Abstract

We compared haemoglobin concentration values obtained using a portable haemoglobinometer, the HemoCue, in the operating theatre with the results obtained by the Coulter Max-M in the laboratory. Haemoglobin concentrations were measured on 52 arterial blood samples obtained from 13 patients during aortic surgery, in theatre with the HemoCue and again by the Coulter Max-M. Twenty routine samples from the laboratory were also analysed by both methods. There was no significant difference between results, with a mean of 10.94 g.dl-1 and 10.90 g.dl-1 for the HemoCue and Coulter, respectively (p = 0.12, t = -1.99, df = 70). The limits of agreement of the two methods (mean difference +/- 2 SD) were -0.37 and +0.45 g.dl-1. The coefficients of repeatability of the 20 samples analysed in duplicate on each device were 0.26 g.dl-1 and 0.33 g.dl-1, respectively. The coefficients of variance were 0.74% (HemoCue) and 0.93% (Coulter). With adequate training and monitoring, the HemoCue provides comparable haemoglobin results for near-patient testing in theatre.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9613300     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00328.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of the accuracy of hemoglobin point of care testing using HemoCue and GEM Premier 3000 with automated hematology analyzer in emergency room.

Authors:  Jan Zatloukal; Jiri Pouska; Jakub Kletecka; Richard Pradl; Jan Benes
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Haematological effect of iron supplementation in breast fed term low birth weight infants.

Authors:  D Aggarwal; H P S Sachdev; J Nagpal; T Singh; V Mallika
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Comparison of HemoCue® hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan.

Authors:  Ishag Adam; Samah Ahmed; Mahmoud H Mahmoud; Mohammed I Yassin
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.644

4.  Reliability of HemoCue in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Andry Van de Louw; Nadine Lasserre; François Drouhin; Stéphane Thierry; Lucien Lecuyer; Daniel Caen; Alain Tenaillon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Methods and analyzers for hemoglobin measurement in clinical laboratories and field settings.

Authors:  Ralph D Whitehead; Zuguo Mei; Carine Mapango; Maria Elena D Jefferds
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Evaluation of a portable hemoglobin photometer in pregnant women in a high altitude area: a pilot study.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhou; Hong Yan; Yuan Xing; Shaonong Dang; Bianba Zhuoma; Duolao Wang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Evaluation of preoperative and intraoperative red blood cell transfusion practices at Maputo Central Hospital, Mozambique.

Authors:  Zachary D C Burke; James B Chen; Celson Conceicao; Risa M Hoffman; Lee T Miller; Atanasio Taela; Daniel A DeUgarte
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Does a digital regional nerve block improve the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring?

Authors:  Ronald D Miller; Theresa A Ward; Charles E McCulloch; Neal H Cohen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Hemoglobin estimation by the HemoCue® portable hemoglobin photometer in a resource poor setting.

Authors:  Bernard Nkrumah; Samuel Blay Nguah; Nimako Sarpong; Denise Dekker; Ali Idriss; Juergen May; Yaw Adu-Sarkodie
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-04-21

10.  Non-invasive measurement of hemoglobin: assessment of two different point-of-care technologies.

Authors:  Etienne Gayat; Jérôme Aulagnier; Emmanuel Matthieu; Mireille Boisson; Marc Fischler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.