PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) effective stiffness to end-diastolic pressure at different loading conditions to demonstrate a relationship between myocardial MRE effective stiffness and end-diastolic left ventricular (LV) pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRE was performed on four pigs to measure the end-diastolic effective stiffness under different loading conditions. End-diastolic pressure was increased by infusing Dextran-40 (20% of blood volume). For each infusion of Dextran-40, end-diastolic pressure was recorded and end-diastolic effective stiffness was measured using MRE. In each pig, least-square linear regression was performed to determine the correlation between end-diastolic effective stiffness and end-diastolic LV pressure. RESULTS: A linear correlation was found between end-diastolic LV pressure and end-diastolic effective stiffness with R(2) ranging from 0.73-0.9. A linear correlation with R(2) = 0.26 was found between end-diastolic LV pressure and end-diastolic effective stiffness when pooling data points from all pigs. CONCLUSION: End-diastolic effective myocardial stiffness increases linearly with end-diastolic LV pressure.
PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) effective stiffness to end-diastolic pressure at different loading conditions to demonstrate a relationship between myocardial MRE effective stiffness and end-diastolic left ventricular (LV) pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRE was performed on four pigs to measure the end-diastolic effective stiffness under different loading conditions. End-diastolic pressure was increased by infusing Dextran-40 (20% of blood volume). For each infusion of Dextran-40, end-diastolic pressure was recorded and end-diastolic effective stiffness was measured using MRE. In each pig, least-square linear regression was performed to determine the correlation between end-diastolic effective stiffness and end-diastolic LV pressure. RESULTS: A linear correlation was found between end-diastolic LV pressure and end-diastolic effective stiffness with R(2) ranging from 0.73-0.9. A linear correlation with R(2) = 0.26 was found between end-diastolic LV pressure and end-diastolic effective stiffness when pooling data points from all pigs. CONCLUSION: End-diastolic effective myocardial stiffness increases linearly with end-diastolic LV pressure.
Authors: Olivier Rouvière; Meng Yin; M Alex Dresner; Phillip J Rossman; Lawrence J Burgart; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Anita C Hoskins; Adam Jacques; Sonya C Bardswell; William J McKenna; Victor Tsang; Cristobal G dos Remedios; Elisabeth Ehler; Kim Adams; Shapour Jalilzadeh; Metin Avkiran; Hugh Watkins; Charles Redwood; Steven B Marston; Jonathan C Kentish Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Arunark Kolipaka; Kiaran P McGee; Philip A Araoz; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Meng Yin; Jayant A Talwalkar; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Roger C Grimm; Phillip J Rossman; Jeff L Fidler; Richard L Ehman Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Juliana S da Silveira; Brian A Scansen; Peter A Wassenaar; Brian Raterman; Chethan Eleswarpu; Ning Jin; Xiaokui Mo; Richard D White; John D Bonagura; Arunark Kolipaka Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Christine U Lee; James F Glockner; Kevin J Glaser; Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Akira Kawashima; Bohyun Kim; Walter K Kremers; Richard L Ehman; James M Gloor Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Cristina Pislaru; Matthew W Urban; Sorin V Pislaru; Randall R Kinnick; James F Greenleaf Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Ivan Z Nenadic; Matthew W Urban; Cristina Pislaru; Daniel Escobar; Luiz Vasconcelos; James F Greenleaf Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Date: 2018-04-30