Literature DB >> 17260391

Applications of magnetic resonance elastography to healthy and pathologic skeletal muscle.

Stacie I Ringleb1, Sabine F Bensamoun, Qingshan Chen, Armando Manduca, Kai-Nan An, Richard L Ehman.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is capable of noninvasively quantifying the mechanical properties of skeletal muscles in vivo. This information can be clinically useful to understand the effects of pathologies on the mechanical properties of muscle and to quantify the effects of treatment. Advances in inversion algorithms quantify muscle anisotropy in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging. Databases of the shear stiffness of skeletal muscle have been presented in the relaxed and contracted states in the upper extremity (biceps brachii, flexor digitorum profundus, and upper trapezius), distal leg muscles (tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, and trapezius), and proximal leg muscles (vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and sartorius). MRE measurements have successfully validated a mathematical model of skeletal muscle behavior in the biceps brachii, correlated to electromyographic data in the distal leg muscles and quantified the effects of pathologies on the distal and proximal leg muscles. Future research efforts should be directed toward improving one-dimensional (1D) and 3D MRE data acquisition and image processing, tracking the effects of treatment on pathologic muscle and correlating the shear stiffness with clinical measurements. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17260391     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  38 in total

1.  Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography.

Authors:  Phillip R Perriñez; Adam J Pattison; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Elastography: modality-specific approaches, clinical applications, and research horizons.

Authors:  Yufei Li; Jess G Snedeker
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

4.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Daniel V Litwiller; Yogesh K Mariappan; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

Review 5.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

6.  Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement.

Authors:  Jonathan Vappou; Elodie Breton; Philippe Choquet; Christian Goetz; Rémy Willinger; André Constantinesco
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Evaluation of the masseter muscle elasticity with the use of acoustic coupling agents as references in strain sonoelastography.

Authors:  M Nakayama; Y Ariji; W Nishiyama; E Ariji
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Contemporary image-based methods for measuring passive mechanical properties of skeletal muscles in vivo.

Authors:  Lynne E Bilston; Bart Bolsterlee; Antoine Nordez; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-09-20

9.  Wave attenuation as a measure of muscle quality as measured by magnetic resonance elastography: initial results.

Authors:  Zachary J Domire; Matthew B McCullough; Qingshan Chen; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Muscle as a molecular machine for protecting joints and bones by absorbing mechanical impacts.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Oleg Rudenko; Salavat Aglyamov; Stanislav Emelianov
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 1.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.