RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) images the propagation of mechanical shear waves in tissue and uses that information to generate quantitative measures of tissue stiffness. Hepatic MRE has been successfully performed in thousands of patients, with good correlation between histologic grade of fibrosis and tissue stiffness. There has been no prior investigation of the utility of MRE for the assessment of kidney transplants. The aims of this study were to prospectively evaluate the feasibility of MRE in a small group of kidney transplant recipients and to correlate the measured magnetic resonance elastographic stiffness values with biopsy-proven histopathologic fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRE of renal transplants was performed in 11 patients returning for protocol allograft biopsies. Calculated tissue stiffness values were compared to histologic degree of fibrosis in nine of the 11 patients. RESULTS: The mean stiffness of two patients with moderate interstitial fibrosis was higher than the mean of six patients with mild interstitial fibrosis, but not significantly so (90 Hz, P = .12; 120 Hz, P = .17; 150 Hz, P = .26). The mean stiffness of the two patients with moderate interstitial fibrosis was slightly greater than the mean of one patient with no significant interstitial fibrosis at 90 Hz (P = .78) and slightly less at 120 and 150 Hz (P = .88 and P = .76). The mean stiffness of the six patients with mild interstitial fibrosis did not differ significantly from that of the one patient with no interstitial fibrosis (90 Hz, P = .35; 120 Hz, P = .22; 150 Hz, P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results demonstrate feasibility and support known multifactorial influences on renal stiffness.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) images the propagation of mechanical shear waves in tissue and uses that information to generate quantitative measures of tissue stiffness. Hepatic MRE has been successfully performed in thousands of patients, with good correlation between histologic grade of fibrosis and tissue stiffness. There has been no prior investigation of the utility of MRE for the assessment of kidney transplants. The aims of this study were to prospectively evaluate the feasibility of MRE in a small group of kidney transplant recipients and to correlate the measured magnetic resonance elastographic stiffness values with biopsy-proven histopathologic fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRE of renal transplants was performed in 11 patients returning for protocol allograft biopsies. Calculated tissue stiffness values were compared to histologic degree of fibrosis in nine of the 11 patients. RESULTS: The mean stiffness of two patients with moderate interstitial fibrosis was higher than the mean of six patients with mild interstitial fibrosis, but not significantly so (90 Hz, P = .12; 120 Hz, P = .17; 150 Hz, P = .26). The mean stiffness of the two patients with moderate interstitial fibrosis was slightly greater than the mean of one patient with no significant interstitial fibrosis at 90 Hz (P = .78) and slightly less at 120 and 150 Hz (P = .88 and P = .76). The mean stiffness of the six patients with mild interstitial fibrosis did not differ significantly from that of the one patient with no interstitial fibrosis (90 Hz, P = .35; 120 Hz, P = .22; 150 Hz, P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results demonstrate feasibility and support known multifactorial influences on renal stiffness.
Authors: K F Stock; B S Klein; M T Vo Cong; O Sarkar; M Römisch; C Regenbogen; M Büttner; T Schuster; E Matevossian; K Amann; D A Clevert; U Heemann; C Küchle Journal: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Maitray D Patel; Carrie J Phillips; Scott W Young; J Scott Kriegshauser; Frederick Chen; William G Eversman; Alvin C Silva; Roxanne Lorans Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Walter D Park; Matthew D Griffin; Lynn D Cornell; Fernando G Cosio; Mark D Stegall Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Trygve Syversveen; Knut Brabrand; Karsten Midtvedt; Erik H Strøm; Anders Hartmann; Jarl A Jakobsen; Audun E Berstad Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Matthew C Murphy; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Joel P Felmlee; Jon Huston; Richard L Ehman Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Anish Kirpalani; Eyesha Hashim; General Leung; Jin K Kim; Adriana Krizova; Serge Jothy; Maya Deeb; Nan N Jiang; Lauren Glick; Gevork Mnatzakanian; Darren A Yuen Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 8.237