Literature DB >> 19572388

Evaluation of a rapid, multiphase MRE sequence in a heart-simulating phantom.

Arunark Kolipaka1, Kiaran P McGee, Philip A Araoz, Kevin J Glaser, Armando Manduca, Richard L Ehman.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to validate stiffness estimates of a phantom undergoing cyclic deformation obtained using a multiphase magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) imaging sequence by comparison with those obtained using a single-phase MRE sequence and to quantify the stability of the multiphase-derived stiffness estimates as a function of deformation frequency and imaging parameters. A spherical rubber shell of 10 cm diameter and 1 cm thickness was connected to a computerized flow pump to produce cyclic pressure variations within the phantom. The phantom was imaged at cyclic pressures between 18-72 bpm using single-phase and multiphase MRE acquisitions. The shear stiffness of the phantom was resolved using a spherical shell wave inversion algorithm. Shear stiffness was averaged over the slice of interest and plotted against pressure within the phantom. A linear correlation was observed between stiffness and pressure. Good correlation (R(2) = 0.98) was observed between the stiffness estimates obtained using the standard single-phase and the multiphase pulse sequences. Stiffness estimates obtained using multiphase MRE were stable when the fraction of the deformation period required for acquisition of a single image was not greater than 42%. The results demonstrate the potential of multiphase MRE technique for imaging dynamic organs, such as the heart.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19572388      PMCID: PMC3076071          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  22 in total

1.  Myocardial stiffness is attributed to alterations in cross-linked collagen rather than total collagen or phenotypes in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  G R Norton; J Tsotetsi; B Trifunovic; C Hartford; G P Candy; A J Woodiwiss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-09-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Effect of temporal resolution on the estimation of left ventricular function by cardiac MR imaging.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Yukihiro Nomura; Takashi Nakaoka; Makoto Watanabe; Shigeru Kiryu; Toshiyuki Okubo; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Dieter Klatt; Uwe Hamhaber; Patrick Asbach; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography. Initial results.

Authors:  Thomas Elgeti; Jens Rump; Uwe Hamhaber; Sebastian Papazoglou; Bernd Hamm; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence.

Authors:  D J Atkinson; R R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Noninvasive Assessment of Regional and Global Myocardial Contractility in Normal Control Subjects and in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Michael J. Domanski; Dean Follman; Marsha Kravitz
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 8.  Current perspectives in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Adelino F Leite-Moreira
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Increased regional myocardial stiffness of the left ventricle during pacing-induced angina in man.

Authors:  P D Bourdillon; B H Lorell; I Mirsky; W J Paulus; J Wynne; W Grossman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Ingolf Sack; Bernd Beierbach; Uwe Hamhaber; Dieter Klatt; Jürgen Braun
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  13 in total

1.  Characterization of a hyper-viscoelastic phantom mimicking biological soft tissue using an abdominal pneumatic driver with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Authors:  Gwladys E Leclerc; Laëtitia Debernard; Félix Foucart; Ludovic Robert; Kay M Pelletier; Fabrice Charleux; Richard Ehman; Marie-Christine Ho Ba Tho; Sabine F Bensamoun
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Quantification of myocardial stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography in right ventricular hypertrophy: initial feasibility in dogs.

Authors:  Juliana S da Silveira; Brian A Scansen; Peter A Wassenaar; Brian Raterman; Chethan Eleswarpu; Ning Jin; Xiaokui Mo; Richard D White; John D Bonagura; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Magnetic resonance elastography as a method for the assessment of effective myocardial stiffness throughout the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Philip A Araoz; Kiaran P McGee; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Estimation of transversely isotropic material properties from magnetic resonance elastography using the optimised virtual fields method.

Authors:  Renee Miller; Arunark Kolipaka; Martyn P Nash; Alistair A Young
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Phantom evaluations of nonlinear inversion MR elastography.

Authors:  Ligin M Solamen; Matthew D McGarry; Likun Tan; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Magnetic resonance elastography as a method to estimate myocardial contractility.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Shivani R Aggarwal; Kiaran P McGee; Nandan Anavekar; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Quantification of aortic stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography: Measurement reproducibility, pulse wave velocity comparison, changes over cardiac cycle, and relationship with age.

Authors:  William E Kenyhercz; Brian Raterman; Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani; Joshua Dowell; Xiaokui Mo; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  In vivo assessment of MR elastography-derived effective end-diastolic myocardial stiffness under different loading conditions.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Kiaran P McGee; Armando Manduca; Nandan Anavekar; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Lamb wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (LDUV) method for quantifying mechanical properties of viscoelastic solids.

Authors:  Ivan Z Nenadic; Matthew W Urban; Scott A Mitchell; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Relative identifiability of anisotropic properties from magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Renee Miller; Arunark Kolipaka; Martyn P Nash; Alistair A Young
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.